Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
radar coverage was supplemented on the East Coast by approximately
4,000 ground observer stations and along the Pacific by an additional
2,~+00.‘~~Reports from ground observers had to be processed through
filter and information centers, both of which required the services of
large numbers of volunteer workers. The interceptor commands had
managed to expedite the construction of the basic elements of this
complex system, but there had not been time to recruit and train all
the personnel required to operate it. Moreover, the network, even
when placed in perfect readiness, could have met only the primary
need of early warning. To permit effective control of fighter planes at
night or during bad weather would have required the addition of
mobile units equipped with the newer radar aids developed in
Britain.lZ4But in December 1941the United States had no radar equip-
ment comparable to the GCI set of Britain, and fighter planes in this
country were still using high frequency-rather than VHF-radio
sets. Airborne radar for night fighters was lacking, as was the identifi-
cation equipment required to distinguish friendly from hostile
~ 1 a n e s . l ~ ~Not a single airplane stationed on the Pacific coast was
equipped with ASV radar,lZ6with the result that crews of patrol
bombers were entirely dependent on visual detection and could oper-
ate only during daylight hours and when visibility was good.
In providing a remedy for the recognized deficiencies of the Amer-
ican warning service, the War Department once again was able to
draw on the experience of Britain. Immediately after Pearl Harbor,
a t the suggestion of the United States military mission in London, the
RAF offered the services of Robert Watson-Watt, Scientific Advisor
on Telecommunications to the Air Ministry.’” His presence in the
United States might serve, the British agreed, to “increase the scope
and operational efficiency” of American radar and would be in line
with Anglo-American efforts to “make the best common use of tech-
nical personnel and materiel.” * 2 8 Accordingly, Watson-Watt arrived
in the United States before the end of December 1941for the purpose
of undertaking a detailed analysis of the peculiar problems of Ameri-
can air defense.
Any vestiges of complacency as to the adequacy of the American
aircraft warning service which may have remained in War Depart-
ment circles were destroyed by the severely critical report made by
Watson-Watt in January 1942 of the air defenses on the West Coast.
Dangerously unsatisfactory conditions existed, reflecting “insufficient
2 9 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.