Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 44 …By Armistice Day forty-five squadrons had been assigned to the front.” But with delays at…
  • p. 47 …up of aircraft from the RAF’s Independent Force, the whole of the French Air Division…
  • p. 48 …One day mission was sufficiently large and suc- cessful to draw more than passing attention. O…
  • p. 80 …resignation from the Army came on the day after T R 440-15 was published. But…
  • p. 186 …War Plans Division to prepare the estimate independently as an Air Staff agency rather than as…
  • p. 258 …Roosevelt attempt curve our independence stop we all know than unless the US has not oppressed…
  • p. 317 …AAF officers were schooled to avoid use of the term “independent air force,” but in most…
  • p. 435 …Brady during days devoted by General Brereton chiefly to consultation with Aus- tralian, British, and Dutch…
  • p. 710 …During World War I, American military forces in Europe had achieved organizational and operational independence, but…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
radar coverage was supplemented on the East Coast by approximately
4,000 ground observer stations and along the Pacific by an additional
2,~+00.‘~~Reports from ground observers had to be processed through
filter and information centers, both of which required the services of
large numbers of volunteer workers. The interceptor commands had
managed to expedite the construction of the basic elements of this
complex system, but there had not been time to recruit and train all
the personnel required to operate it. Moreover, the network, even
when placed in perfect readiness, could have met only the primary
need of early warning. To permit effective control of fighter planes at
night or during bad weather would have required the addition of
mobile units equipped with the newer radar aids developed in
Britain.lZ4But in December 1941the United States had no radar equip-
ment comparable to the GCI set of Britain, and fighter planes in this
country were still using high frequency-rather than VHF-radio
sets. Airborne radar for night fighters was lacking, as was the identifi-
cation equipment required to distinguish friendly from hostile
~ 1 a n e s . l ~ ~Not a single airplane stationed on the Pacific coast was
equipped with ASV radar,lZ6with the result that crews of patrol
bombers were entirely dependent on visual detection and could oper-
ate only during daylight hours and when visibility was good.
In providing a remedy for the recognized deficiencies of the Amer-
ican warning service, the War Department once again was able to
draw on the experience of Britain. Immediately after Pearl Harbor,
a t the suggestion of the United States military mission in London, the
RAF offered the services of Robert Watson-Watt, Scientific Advisor
on Telecommunications to the Air Ministry.’” His presence in the
United States might serve, the British agreed, to “increase the scope
and operational efficiency” of American radar and would be in line
with Anglo-American efforts to “make the best common use of tech-
nical personnel and materiel.” * 2 8 Accordingly, Watson-Watt arrived
in the United States before the end of December 1941for the purpose
of undertaking a detailed analysis of the peculiar problems of Ameri-
can air defense.
Any vestiges of complacency as to the adequacy of the American
aircraft warning service which may have remained in War Depart-
ment circles were destroyed by the severely critical report made by
Watson-Watt in January 1942 of the air defenses on the West Coast.
Dangerously unsatisfactory conditions existed, reflecting “insufficient
2 9 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.