Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 173 …At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made…
  • p. 226 …Air Service Command under Col. L.S. Churchill. Because of a shortage of experienced officers, only…
  • p. 282 …President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs of staff, then meeting in Washington, had…
  • p. 287 …the arrival in Washington of Prime Minister Churchill, his chiefs of staff, and other high-ranking…
  • p. 290 …stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request, U.S. troops were to relieve…
  • p. 302 …the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime Minister and Minister of Defense…
  • p. 303 …Field Marshal Sir John Dill representing Mr. Churchill as Minister of De- fense. Sir John Dill…
  • p. 304 …of such a personal representative of Mr. Churchill might make difficult the maintenance of normal military…
  • p. 425 …O n the same day, Prime Minister Churchill informed Gen. Sir Archibald Wavell of his selection…
  • p. 628 …Western Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their military staffs in the ARCADIA…
  • p. 630 …strong support in a long cable from Churchill to Roosevelt, delivered on 5 March, in which…
  • p. 636 …first in a gen- eral meeting with Churchill, later among the airmen alone.34Arnold reviewed the…
  • p. 639 …Much had happened in the two months which had passed since Churchill had approved that plan…
  • p. 640 …Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill…
  • p. 641 …postponement was al- most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the 27th. In…
  • p. 642 …then back in Washington, that Roosevelt and Churchill “believed” that T O R C H was…
  • p. 661 …Even during the Battle of Britain, Churchill could tell the House of Commons that “there seems…
  • p. 705 …4 1 . ~ ~The following month, Prime Minister Churchill in conference with Messrs. Harry Hopkins and Averell…
  • p. 810 …2 0 August 1940, in R.S. Churchill, ed., Into Battle (London, 1941),p. 2 5…
  • p. 811 …comp., Winston Churchill’s Secret Session Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85. 161. Larner report, as…
  • p. 845 …L.S., 182 Churchill, Prime Minister Winston, 133, 1369 141, 232, 235-37, 2409 2431 252…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
radar coverage was supplemented on the East Coast by approximately
4,000 ground observer stations and along the Pacific by an additional
2,~+00.‘~~Reports from ground observers had to be processed through
filter and information centers, both of which required the services of
large numbers of volunteer workers. The interceptor commands had
managed to expedite the construction of the basic elements of this
complex system, but there had not been time to recruit and train all
the personnel required to operate it. Moreover, the network, even
when placed in perfect readiness, could have met only the primary
need of early warning. To permit effective control of fighter planes at
night or during bad weather would have required the addition of
mobile units equipped with the newer radar aids developed in
Britain.lZ4But in December 1941the United States had no radar equip-
ment comparable to the GCI set of Britain, and fighter planes in this
country were still using high frequency-rather than VHF-radio
sets. Airborne radar for night fighters was lacking, as was the identifi-
cation equipment required to distinguish friendly from hostile
~ 1 a n e s . l ~ ~Not a single airplane stationed on the Pacific coast was
equipped with ASV radar,lZ6with the result that crews of patrol
bombers were entirely dependent on visual detection and could oper-
ate only during daylight hours and when visibility was good.
In providing a remedy for the recognized deficiencies of the Amer-
ican warning service, the War Department once again was able to
draw on the experience of Britain. Immediately after Pearl Harbor,
a t the suggestion of the United States military mission in London, the
RAF offered the services of Robert Watson-Watt, Scientific Advisor
on Telecommunications to the Air Ministry.’” His presence in the
United States might serve, the British agreed, to “increase the scope
and operational efficiency” of American radar and would be in line
with Anglo-American efforts to “make the best common use of tech-
nical personnel and materiel.” * 2 8 Accordingly, Watson-Watt arrived
in the United States before the end of December 1941for the purpose
of undertaking a detailed analysis of the peculiar problems of Ameri-
can air defense.
Any vestiges of complacency as to the adequacy of the American
aircraft warning service which may have remained in War Depart-
ment circles were destroyed by the severely critical report made by
Watson-Watt in January 1942 of the air defenses on the West Coast.
Dangerously unsatisfactory conditions existed, reflecting “insufficient
2 9 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.