Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
which could generate considerable power a t very short wave lengths.
No one nation enjoyed a monopoly of these discoveries, but the most
rapid progress in devising practical military applications was registered
by the British.
The basic problem of providing early warning to defending aircraft
had been solved in Britain by 1939. A chain of radar stations along the
coast provided reasonably effective information on planes approach-
ing from the continent."' Thus, when the Germans began large-scale
daylight raids against England in August 1940, the RAF was able to
conserve its limited fighter strength by keeping the planes on the
ground until an attack actually impended and thus to achieve a more
efficient concentration of force.lo3 When the Germans switched to
indiscriminate night attacks, British defenses for a time proved less
effective,lo4 for advance warning of the enemy's approach did little
good unless he could be found in the dark. Fortunately, the RAF,
magnificently served by such advisers as Robert Watson-Watt,
rapidly went beyond the original conception of radar as merely a
device for early warning. Under the compulsion of war and the special
lash of the night blitz, the British perfected and put into use a whole
new series of electronic devices which guided every step in the proc-
ess of intercepting enemy planes.
T h e original radar equipment installed along the coasts of Britain
had been well suited to handling daytime raids, for it had a long range-
up to 2 0 0 miles. But these sets did not permit the fine discrimination
between targets which was needed to guide night fighters to the
immediate vicinity of enemy A new type of radar known
as GCI (ground controlled interception) transformed the British sys-
tem from one of crude warning into a machine for dependable control
of interception. GCI equipment made it feasible to plot, virtually
instantaneously, the positions of a large number of planes. Moreover,
it displayed the information on an ingenious PPI (plan position indi-
cator) scope, which was a cathode ray tube on the face of which a map
of the region had been drawn. Aircraft within range of the GCI set
were shown on the map as spots of light.lo6The British also developed
equipment known as IFF (identification friend or foe) which indicated
to a ground observer which of the targets in the PPI scope were
friendly. The identification was accomplished by installing in friendly
planes an electronic device-a simple short-wave radio transmitter-
which sent coded signals when interrogated by a ground station.lo7
288

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.