Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
varied from “very slow” to over zoo miles per hour, were observed to
parade across the ~kies.‘~These mysterious forces dropped no bombs
and, despite the fact that 1,440rounds of antiaircraft ammunition were
directed against them, suffered no losses. There were reports, to be
sure, that four enemy planes had been shot down, and one was sup-
posed to have landed in flames a t a Hollywood intersection.80 Resi-
dents in a forty-mile arc along the coast watched from hills or rooftops
as the play of guns and searchlights provided the first real drama of
the war for citizens of the mainland. The dawn, which ended the
shooting and the fantasy, also proved that the only damage which
resulted to the city was such as had been caused by the excitement
(there was at least one death from heart failure), by traffic accidents
in the blacked-out streets, or by shell fragments from the artillery
barrage.81
Attempts to arrive at an explanation of the incident quickly became
as involved and mysterious as the “battle” itself. The Navy immedi-
ately insisted that there was no evidence of the presence of enemy
planes, and Secretary Knox announced at a press conference on 2 5
February that the raid was just a false At the same conference
he admitted that attacks were always possible and indicated that vital
industries located along the coast ought to be moved inland. The Army
had a hard time making up its mind on the cause of the alert. A report
to Washington, made by the Western Defense Command shortly after
the raid had ended, indicated that the credibility of reports of an attack
had begun to be shaken before the blackout was lifted. This message
predicted that developments would prove “that most previous reports
had been greatly exaggerated.” 8 3 The Fourth Air Force had indicated
its belief that there were no planes over Los Angeles. But the Army
did not publish these initial conclusions. Instead, it waited a day, until
after a thorough examination of witnesses had been fini~hed.~”On the
basis of these hearings, local commanders altered their verdict and
indicated a belief that from one to five unidentified airplanes had been
over Los A n g e l e ~ . ~ ~Secretary Stimson announced this conclusion as
the War Department version of the incident, and he advanced two
theories to account for the mysterious craft: either they were commer-
cial planes operated by an enemy from secret fields in California or
Mexico, or they were light planes launched from Japanese sub-
marines.86In either case, the enemy’s purpose must have been to locate
antiaircraft defenses in the area or to deliver a blow at civilian morale.
284

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.