Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
resulted from their belief that such a raid as this would be employed
by the enemy to divert attention from a major air task force which
would hurl its planes against a really significant target. Loyal Japanese-
Americans who had predicted that a demonstration would be made in
connection with the President’s speech also prophesied that Los
Angeles would be attacked the next night.’4 The Army, too, was con-
vinced that some new action impended, and took all possible precau-
tions. Newspapers were permitted to announce that a strict state of
readiness against renewed attacks had been imposed,75and there fol-
lowed the confused action known as “the Battle of Los Angeles.”
During the night of 24/25 February 1942, unidentified objects
caused a succession of alerts in southern California. On the 24tl1, a
warning issued by naval intelligence indicated that an attack could be
expected within the next ten hours.76That evening a large number of
flares and blinking lights were reported from the vicinity of defense
plants. An alert called a t I 9 I 8 was lifted a t 2 2 2 3 , and the tension tem-
porarily relaxed. But early in the morning of the 25th renewed activity
began. Radars picked up an unidentified target 1 2 0 miles west of Los
Angeles. Antiaircraft batteries were alerted a t 02 I 5 and were put on
Green Alert-ready to fire-a few minutes later. The AAF kept its
pursuit planes on the ground, preferring to await indications of the
scale and direction of any attack before committing its limited fighter
f o r ~ e . ~ ’Radars tracked the approaching target to within a few miles
of the coast, and a t 0 2 2 I the regional controller ordered a blacko~t.~’
Thereafter the information center was flooded with reports of “enemy
planes,” even though the mysterious object tracked in from sea seems
to have vanished. At 0 2 4 3 , planes were reported near Long Beach,
and a few minutes later a coast artillery colonel spotted “about 2 5
planes at IZ,OOO feet” over Los Angeles. At 0306 a balloon carrying .a
red flare was seen over Santa Monica and four batteries of antiaircraft
artillery opened fire, whereupon “the air over Los Angeles erupted
like a volcano.” From this point on reports were hopelessly a t variance.
Probably much of the confusion came from the fact that antiaircraft
shell bursts, caught by the searchlights, were themselves mistaken for
enemy planes. In any case, the next three hours produced some of the
most imaginative reporting of the war: “swarms” of planes (or, some-
times, balloons) of all possible sizes, numbering from one to several
hundred, traveling at altitudes which ranged from a few thousand
feet to more than to,ooo and flying a t speeds which were said to have
283

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.