Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
true. With what forces could so threatening a surface fleet have been
opposed? There is good evidence on this point, for the Fourth Air
Force actually issued an order to “attack and destroy” the enemy task
force. By good fortune, fourteen bombers destined for the Southwest
Pacific were in the vicinity; but it was found that the machine-gun
turrets on the planes would not operate, that there was no adequate
supply of oxygen for high-altitude operations, that only a few 300-
and 600-lb. bombs were on hand, and that the bombers would have to
enter an engagement without fighter H o w effective this
force-which was larger than any normally stationed along the coast-
would have been against a major enemy fleet must be left to the
imagination, but competent authorities were convinced that a vigorous
attack would have overwhelmed American air units a t any of the
chief points of defense along the western ~eaboard.~‘
In spite of this grave concern for the safety of the West Coast, the
first attack on a land objective in the Americas actually was directed
against Aruba, in the Caribbean. O n this small Dutch-owned island,
and on neighboring Curasao, were located large refineries which
processed oil from wells in Venezuela and currently accounted for
one-third of the United Nations’ supply of high-octane ga~oline.~’In
May 1940 the British had furnished small garrisons for the islands,59
but the increased danger after Pearl Harbor led the Anglo-American
planners a t the ARCADIA conference to decide that larger forces of
U.S. troops were needed.60 T w o flights of light bombers from the
Caribbean Air Force accordingly were sent to Aruba and Curasao in
mid-January 1 9 4 2 , ~ ~but attempts to send ground forces encountered
diplomatic difficulties. At the end of January, President Roosevelt
advised the President of Venezuela that, in deference to the latter’s
objections, the United States would delay the dispatch of troops; but
he indicated that the situation was so serious that steps would have to
be taken to safeguard the vital refineries.62 Public announcement of
the troop movement was made on I I February.63
Early in the morning of 1 6 February, aggressive enemy submarine
action in the Caribbean area began with an attack on shipping off the
harbor at San Nicholas, Aruba.” After destroying two tankers, a
submarine surfaced and shelled buildings of the Standard Oil refinery
and then moved upshore for further attacks on shipping. T h e damage
to the refinery was only superficial, but a torpedo which landed on
* See also p. 536.
2 8 1

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.