Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
stations left the air. Since there was no system for warning the public
-New York's air raid sirens were not installed until February 1942 50-
the police took the initiative in spreading news of the alert. As a pre-
cautionary measure school children were hurriedly sent home. No
general hysteria was noted, but the warning was taken for the real
thing on Wall Street, where a wave of selling on the exchanges
brought security quotations down hundreds of millions of dollars in
the worst slump of the stock market since the collapse of France."
T h e alarm spread to Boston, where police shifted heavy stores of guns
and ammunition from storage vaults to stations throughout the city,
and where industrial establishments were advised to prepare for a
raid.52
The many alerts of this period reflect the inexperience of both the
public and the defense forces. To some critics they indicated a delib-
erate attempt by the Army to frighten the public in order to stimulate
interest in war preparations. Before accepting this view, however, it
should be noted that many of the reports of unidentified aircraft,
leading to precautionary blackouts, resulted from mechanical difficul-
ties with new radar equipment and from the understandable mistakes
of inadequately trained personnel. Further, there is every evidence
that Army commanders were genuinely convinced that the danger of
attack, especially against the West Coast, was very Military
men knew better than the layman how limited were the defenses
against air attack. Along the Pacific coast in December 1941 there
were, for example, only forty-five thoroughly modern fighter planes 54
to defend a coast line which extended for 1 , 2 0 0 miles, and along which
were located such important aircraft plants as those of Boeing in
Seattle, Douglas and Lockheed in Los Angeles, and Consolidated in
San Diego. In heavy bombers, the defenders were even less well
equipped; for at the close of 1941,there were only ten such planes
stationed along the entire coast and the number within reach for con-
centration against an enemy force was indeed limited. Although there
were seventy-five medium bombers a t hand, their short range cut
down their usefulness against the type of attack expected. Moreover,
during late 1941 crews of both fighters and bombers were handicapped
by an acute shortage of a m m ~ n i t i o n . ~ ~
T o reconstruct the problem as it appeared to air officers at the time,
let us assume that the report of the presence of thirty-four Japanese
ships off the California coast on 9 December 1941 had proved to be
2 8 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.