Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 173 …At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made…
  • p. 226 …Air Service Command under Col. L.S. Churchill. Because of a shortage of experienced officers, only…
  • p. 282 …President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs of staff, then meeting in Washington, had…
  • p. 287 …the arrival in Washington of Prime Minister Churchill, his chiefs of staff, and other high-ranking…
  • p. 290 …stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request, U.S. troops were to relieve…
  • p. 302 …the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime Minister and Minister of Defense…
  • p. 303 …Field Marshal Sir John Dill representing Mr. Churchill as Minister of De- fense. Sir John Dill…
  • p. 304 …of such a personal representative of Mr. Churchill might make difficult the maintenance of normal military…
  • p. 425 …O n the same day, Prime Minister Churchill informed Gen. Sir Archibald Wavell of his selection…
  • p. 628 …Western Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their military staffs in the ARCADIA…
  • p. 630 …strong support in a long cable from Churchill to Roosevelt, delivered on 5 March, in which…
  • p. 636 …first in a gen- eral meeting with Churchill, later among the airmen alone.34Arnold reviewed the…
  • p. 639 …Much had happened in the two months which had passed since Churchill had approved that plan…
  • p. 640 …Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill…
  • p. 641 …postponement was al- most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the 27th. In…
  • p. 642 …then back in Washington, that Roosevelt and Churchill “believed” that T O R C H was…
  • p. 661 …Even during the Battle of Britain, Churchill could tell the House of Commons that “there seems…
  • p. 705 …4 1 . ~ ~The following month, Prime Minister Churchill in conference with Messrs. Harry Hopkins and Averell…
  • p. 810 …2 0 August 1940, in R.S. Churchill, ed., Into Battle (London, 1941),p. 2 5…
  • p. 811 …comp., Winston Churchill’s Secret Session Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85. 161. Larner report, as…
  • p. 845 …L.S., 182 Churchill, Prime Minister Winston, 133, 1369 141, 232, 235-37, 2409 2431 252…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
stations left the air. Since there was no system for warning the public
-New York's air raid sirens were not installed until February 1942 50-
the police took the initiative in spreading news of the alert. As a pre-
cautionary measure school children were hurriedly sent home. No
general hysteria was noted, but the warning was taken for the real
thing on Wall Street, where a wave of selling on the exchanges
brought security quotations down hundreds of millions of dollars in
the worst slump of the stock market since the collapse of France."
T h e alarm spread to Boston, where police shifted heavy stores of guns
and ammunition from storage vaults to stations throughout the city,
and where industrial establishments were advised to prepare for a
raid.52
The many alerts of this period reflect the inexperience of both the
public and the defense forces. To some critics they indicated a delib-
erate attempt by the Army to frighten the public in order to stimulate
interest in war preparations. Before accepting this view, however, it
should be noted that many of the reports of unidentified aircraft,
leading to precautionary blackouts, resulted from mechanical difficul-
ties with new radar equipment and from the understandable mistakes
of inadequately trained personnel. Further, there is every evidence
that Army commanders were genuinely convinced that the danger of
attack, especially against the West Coast, was very Military
men knew better than the layman how limited were the defenses
against air attack. Along the Pacific coast in December 1941 there
were, for example, only forty-five thoroughly modern fighter planes 54
to defend a coast line which extended for 1 , 2 0 0 miles, and along which
were located such important aircraft plants as those of Boeing in
Seattle, Douglas and Lockheed in Los Angeles, and Consolidated in
San Diego. In heavy bombers, the defenders were even less well
equipped; for at the close of 1941,there were only ten such planes
stationed along the entire coast and the number within reach for con-
centration against an enemy force was indeed limited. Although there
were seventy-five medium bombers a t hand, their short range cut
down their usefulness against the type of attack expected. Moreover,
during late 1941 crews of both fighters and bombers were handicapped
by an acute shortage of a m m ~ n i t i o n . ~ ~
T o reconstruct the problem as it appeared to air officers at the time,
let us assume that the report of the presence of thirty-four Japanese
ships off the California coast on 9 December 1941 had proved to be
2 8 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.