Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E F E N S E O F T H E W E S T E R N H E M I S P H E R E
human habitations were scarce, the terrain was wild and desolate, few
radio aids existed, and maps were incomplete or misleading. Particu-
larly poor conditions prevailed between Fort Nelson and Watson
Lake, and in this area, as one pilot observed, “any haphazard guessing
will lead to disaster.” 3 1 Bitter experience quickly demonstrated the
costliness of sending untrained aircrews over this route. Essentially,
then, for the first months of the war Alaska had no adequate air
defense. T w o days before the outbreak of hostilities, Col. Everett S.
Davis, pioneer Air Corps leader in Alaska, had aptly characterized the
force a t his command as no more than “a cadre sent to the territory in
advance of the main body.” 32 T o carry out plans, fortunately already
agreed upon, for moving up the main body presented a task of the
highest priority, for spring would bring weather favorable to a major
enemy attack.
Concern over the safety of the hemisphere was not limited to fears
for its outposts. By an order of I I December, the Western Defense
Command became a theater of operations; 3 3 on 2 0 December, a similar
order provided for an eastern theater along the Atlantic By
these acts, defense received priority over all training activity in both
coastal zones, which were now raised to a new category of defense
(Category C ) in recognition of the fact that minor attacks were not
only possible but probable.35It will be noted that it was not anticipated
that enemy forces could bring to bear any sustained attack on the con-
tinental area, but, as Pearl Harbor had so forcefully demonstrated, a
single and well-directed blow could inflict serious injury.
That the chief focus of attention fell first on the Pacific rather
than the Atlantic coast is explained by the former’s peculiarly exposed
position following the Pearl Harbor attack.” Concentration of some of
the larger aircraft plants in that region appeared to offer especially
tempting bait for a Japanese raid. Fortunately, news of the start of war
did not come as a complete surprise to the military forces there. T h e
warning message sent by the War Department to the Western Defense
Command on 27 November 1941,indicating that negotiations with
Japan in effect had terminated and that war was probable, had resulted
in an acceleration of measures being taken to provide an aircraft warn-
ing service.3EDefense arrangements were further facilitated by the
.On the Atlantic side, principal concern was with the pros ect of submarine at-
tack. AAF participation in the inauguration of emergency patroPs is separately treated
below in Chapter 15.
277

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.