Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 326 …The inland route offered better weather, but north of Edmonton * See above, pp. 166-70. t…
  • p. 416 …On 13 June, eleven airlines were ordered to send all available planes to Edmonton. Commercial schedules…
  • p. 417 …less, and when the crews returned to Edmonton they were an exhausted, unshaven, red-eyed lot…
  • p. 847 …Eastern Theater of Operations, 294 Econoniic Warfare, Board of, 256 Ecuador, 1 2 5 , 301 Edmonton…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the Sault Sainte Marie canals, aircraft plants along both coasts, oil
refineries off the coast of Venezuela, bauxite mines in the Guianas,
and cryolite deposits-needed in making aluminum-at Ivigtut, Green-
land. Military commanders, impressed with the damaged reputations
which had been caused by Pearl Harbor, demanded large reinforce-
ments to assure the safety of the area each was charged with defend-
ing." Had the War Department listened to all these pleas, the existing
air force would have been dispersed in small and ineffective units, and
the AAF would have been required to surrender any early hope of
building an offensive force. A system of priorities was essential, and,
because the chief fear was of further carrier raids by Japan, initial air
defense arrangements took the form of emergency reinforcements for
Panama, Alaska, and the continental West Coast."
A great deal of attention had been given before the war to the
defenses of the Panama Canal, and to a superficial observer this target
might have appeared to be well defended in December 1941.+There
were, to be sure, three pursuit groups and the equivalent of two bom-
bardment groups on duty in or near the Canal Zone, and these units
had in addition to obsolete equipment more than IOO reasonably mod-
ern airplanes.I2 T h e appearance, however, was misleading, and the
following fundamental weaknesses demanded immediate remedial
measures: of the airplanes assigned, only one squadron of B-17's was
capable of operating at high altitudes; only two ineffectual radar sta-
tions were available; neither the Army nor the Navy had enough
planes to provide adequate offshore patrols; and aircraft bases were
so concentrated that a surprise raid on two fields, situated only five
miles apart, might have destroyed two-thirds of the tactical planes
assigned to defend the ~ana1.I~
Officials in Washington were aware of the danger to the canal and
gave priority to furnishing nine additional heavy bombers.l* Pursuit
reinforcements were provided from within the Caribbean Defense
Command by transferring twenty-five P-40's from Puerto Rico to
the Canal Zone, a movement completed on 14 December.15 At the
end of December, eighty additional pursuit planes arrived in Panama
from the United States1' The critical need for aircraft warning instru-
ments was eased by the arrival on 26 December of four mobile radar
sets.17Meantime, AAF officers in Panama had taken local measures to
increase the readiness of their units. During December, planes were
* See above, pp. 160-66.
2 7 4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.