Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Mr. Neuberger wrote, the Northwest was blacked out from Puget
Sound to southern Oregon, radio stations had been off the air for six-
teen hours, and enemy aircraft were reported near the mouth of the
Columbia River. It was not known whether the reports of enemy
activity were founded on fact or rumor, but “men and women whose
Congressional representatives less than a month ago voted overwhelm-
ingly against repeal of the Neutrality Act are now prepared to believe
such reports implicitly.” And on the preceding night “store windows in
Seattle which did not dim were smashed by irate citizens.”
An official estimate of the danger was given to the nation by Presi-
dent Roosevelt in a radio address on 9 D e ~ e m b e r . ~The Chief Executive
admitted that the losses a t Pearl Harbor constituted a serious setback
and bluntly told the people to prepare for a long war against powerful
foes. H e warned that the initial attack could be repeated “at any one
of many points in both oceans and along our coast lines and against the
rest of the hemisphere.” Summing up the terrible lesson which had been
contained in the rain of bombs on American ships and planes in the
Pacific, the President suggested that it ought to be clear to every citi-
zen “that our ocean-girt hemisphere is not immune from severe attack-
that we cannot measure our safety in terms of miles on any map.” At
the same time, Mr. Roosevelt outlined views which were to be reiter-
ated through the discouraging months of the first half-year of disaster
and retreat, namely, that although the country might be attacked,
nothing must deter the nation from its principal job of preparing to
take the war to the enemy.
Supporting the apprehensions of the people and the President’s
warning, there were sober estimates of the situation by responsible mili-
tary leaders. As early as 8 December, the Navy reported that the losses
sustained in Hawaii had left the Pacific Fleet unable to carry out the
tasks assigned to it in the existing war plan,4 and the next day Secretary
Stimson reported to President Roosevelt that the War Department
plan for the defense of the Pacific coast had been based on the security
provided by Hawaii and the fleet, and that “the present attack has left
the West Coast unprotected.” There was felt to be a grave possibility
that the Japanese might, by renewed attacks, capture islands in the
Hawaiian group ‘ and thereby penetrate the Pacific defense triangle
(Alaska-Hawaii-Panama) . Even without reducing Hawaii, the enemy
was in a position to carry out raids against aircraft plants and ship-
building installations along the Pacific seaboard.’
272

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.