Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
of the existing system and raised no objections to the proposed
changes.’ O 8 The results of the deliberations of McNarney’s committee
were incorporated in War Department Circular 59, issued on t March
1942 and effective on 9 March. As a circular, its provisions lacked
permanent validity.
The new directive abolished GHQ. The field forces remained under
the control of the General Staff, and the War Plans Division (later
OPD) assumed planning and operational functions over all theaters
of operation and the four defense commands. T o care for Zone of
Interior functions, three autonomous and co-ordinate commands were
established under the Chief of Staff-the Army Air Forces, the Army
Ground Forces, and the Services of Supply (later Army Service
Forces). The General Staff was reorganized to include a more equable
proportion of air officers. This arrangement removed a long-standing
grievance by giving the air arm equal status with the ground arm, if
not with the Army itself. It did away, too, with the internal friction
which had stemmed from the ambiguous division of authority between
the Office of the Chief of the Air Corps and the Air Force Combat
Command. Those agencies indeed were eliminated in the new AAF,
and the functions of the former were divided between a reorganized
Air Staff and a number of subordinate commands in the Zone of In-
terior. As for the AFCC, its very raison d’ktre had disappeared during
the early months of the war. Of the four continental air forces pre-
viously assigned to it, the First and Fourth had been turned over to
the Eastern and Western Defense Commands, respectively, and the
Second and Third had become essentially agencies for unit training.log
For all his elevation from Chief, AAF to Commanding General, AAF,
Arnold had been shorn of the limited combat functions he had pre-
viously enjoyed by virtue of his control over the Combat Command.
Ostensibly, the Army Air Forces had been reconstituted merely as
a supply and training agency. That fact may have been overlooked
by the casual reader of public announcements of the new “stream-
lined” War Department organization, which according to one jour-
nalist was so pleasing to air officers that they “practically trod on
air.” 1 1 0 But the limitation was clearly indicated in the new statement
of the AAF mission-‘‘to procure and maintain equipment peculiar
to the Army Air Forces and to provide air force units properly or-
ganized, trained and equipped for combat operations.” In theory it
was only through W a r Plans Division that Arnold, as Commanding
264

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.