Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
War Plans Division suggested the latter solution in August, then
turned to fruitless efforts to reach an agreement by modifying the
present By September, General McNair had become skepti-
cal of the possibility of securing the authority requisite for effective
functioning of his office.lo0 From the August deliberations on, the
AAF favored drastic reorganization. O n 6 October the Air Staff pro-
rogued for duration of the emergency all attempts to secure complete
independence of the air force.’” This decision served merely to con-
centrate all efforts toward achieving a parity with the ground forces,
which seemed impossible of attainment under the present status and
constituency of GHQ. During the late summer and early fall, various
expedients were examined by members of the Air Staff and by con-
sultants drawn from the Bureau of the Budget.lo2 On 2 4 October
General Spaatz, Chief of the Air Staff, forwarded to W P D a vigorous
objection to the existing organization, recommending the abolition of
GHQ and the establishment, under the Chief of Staff and a compact
General Staff, of autonomous air, ground, and service forces. This
proposal met with ‘‘100 per cent non-concurrences.” l o 3 A month
later, on 2 5 November, General Arnold recommended to the Chief
of Staff a reorganization of the War Department along similar lines
and the creation of a military policy staff for the President which
should include members from the several services and appropriate
civilian agencies.lo4The second part of this scheme lay entirely outside
the jurisdiction of General Marshall; but he was “favorably im-
pressed” by Arnold’s design for the War Department, and on 28
November he directed WPD to develop a detailed plan incorporating
its principal
Brig. Gen. Joseph T. McNarney, an air officer who had been drawn
into the General Staff under the recent liberalizing policy, was put in
charge of the project, H e was recalled from his current assignment
with the special observers in London, arriving in Washington just
after the Japanese attack in the Pacific and just in time to be named
to the Roberts Commission to investigate the disaster at Pearl
Harb0r.l“ Thus delayed, it was early February before McNarney’s
group had determined the general character of the reorganization. The
views of the AAF were presented to McNarney by a special com-
mittee appointed by Arnold and headed by Lt. Col. B. E. Gates.lo7
General Headquarters was not consulted until 5 February, but Gen-
eral McNair had long since been convinced of the impractical nature
2 6 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.