Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 47 …s Independent Force, the whole of the French Air Division (strategic reserve), and Italian and Portuguese…
  • p. 113 …Japanese Air Power The Japanese air forces, divided into separate army and navy air arms, had…
  • p. 119 …naval air service, and a colonial air force.” For their air doctrines, the Italians depended almost…
  • p. 120 …In its first “combat” test during the thirties the Italian Air Force faced no real opposition…
  • p. 121 …The hope was not fulfilled, for numerous weaknesses in the Italian Air Force rapidly came to…
  • p. 122 …The fundamental weakness of the Italian Air Force was not in its theory of air power…
  • p. 197 …naval forces, and within prescribed boundaries to destroy any German and Italian naval, air, and ground…
  • p. 386 …More threatening were Rommel’s forces in North Africa, for the very existence of the air…
  • p. 554 …Chennault, who since 1937 had been serving as special adviser to the Chinese Air Force. Known…
  • p. 705 …Brett, Chief of the Air Corps, to England for study of the problem. Specifically, he was…
  • p. 752 …USSBS, Japanese Air Power. 9. Notes on the Italian Air Force, in special file of Brig…
  • p. 805 …History, First Air Force. 44. History, Caribbean Air Force, 8 May 1941-6 Mar. 1942, p…
  • p. 851 …E S Italian Air Force: 82-85; development, Italian East Africa, 84 Italy, Air Ministry, 82…
  • p. 857 …See Italian Air Force. Reinforcements. See theaters. Renault works, 593 Replacement Control Depot, ~ z t h…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
War Plans Division suggested the latter solution in August, then
turned to fruitless efforts to reach an agreement by modifying the
present By September, General McNair had become skepti-
cal of the possibility of securing the authority requisite for effective
functioning of his office.lo0 From the August deliberations on, the
AAF favored drastic reorganization. O n 6 October the Air Staff pro-
rogued for duration of the emergency all attempts to secure complete
independence of the air force.’” This decision served merely to con-
centrate all efforts toward achieving a parity with the ground forces,
which seemed impossible of attainment under the present status and
constituency of GHQ. During the late summer and early fall, various
expedients were examined by members of the Air Staff and by con-
sultants drawn from the Bureau of the Budget.lo2 On 2 4 October
General Spaatz, Chief of the Air Staff, forwarded to W P D a vigorous
objection to the existing organization, recommending the abolition of
GHQ and the establishment, under the Chief of Staff and a compact
General Staff, of autonomous air, ground, and service forces. This
proposal met with ‘‘100 per cent non-concurrences.” l o 3 A month
later, on 2 5 November, General Arnold recommended to the Chief
of Staff a reorganization of the War Department along similar lines
and the creation of a military policy staff for the President which
should include members from the several services and appropriate
civilian agencies.lo4The second part of this scheme lay entirely outside
the jurisdiction of General Marshall; but he was “favorably im-
pressed” by Arnold’s design for the War Department, and on 28
November he directed WPD to develop a detailed plan incorporating
its principal
Brig. Gen. Joseph T. McNarney, an air officer who had been drawn
into the General Staff under the recent liberalizing policy, was put in
charge of the project, H e was recalled from his current assignment
with the special observers in London, arriving in Washington just
after the Japanese attack in the Pacific and just in time to be named
to the Roberts Commission to investigate the disaster at Pearl
Harb0r.l“ Thus delayed, it was early February before McNarney’s
group had determined the general character of the reorganization. The
views of the AAF were presented to McNarney by a special com-
mittee appointed by Arnold and headed by Lt. Col. B. E. Gates.lo7
General Headquarters was not consulted until 5 February, but Gen-
eral McNair had long since been convinced of the impractical nature
2 6 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.