Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
position as Chief of the Air Corps, it nevertheless lent additional weight
to his persistent efforts.
One significant instance occurred soon after GHQ was established.
As Chief of the Air Corps, Arnold promulgated on 14 August an
elaborate training directive for the GHQ Air Force. Although GHQ
had been made responsible for the training of all combat units, and
on 19 November was specifically given “direct control” over the
GHQ Air Force, the directive was allowed to stand. Thereafter Gen-
eral McNair exercised hardly more than a nominal supervision over
air training.8’ This de facto situation was legalized in the revision of
Army Regulation 95-5 on 20 June 1941,+whereby the Army Air
Forces was established and its Chief, General Arnold, was given con-
trol over both unit and individual training.88 General Headquarters’
responsibility for air force training was limited to combined air-
ground operations.
If AR 95-5 clarified the training issue, it evoked more serious prob-
lems concerning the planning and control of air combat operations
when, a fortnight later, GHQ was made responsible for those func-
tions. One purpose in creating the Army Air Forces was to eliminate
internal friction between combat and service agencies, a hope which
did not materialize.*’ In broader context, the move was one phase of
the current trend toward “streamlining” the organization of the War
Department. The Secretary of War had approved “decentralizing our
staff work to permit Air Force autonomy in the degree needed,” while
opposing “segregated independence.” Certainly the powers given
to General Arnold as Chief of the Army Air Forces constituted the
greatest single step toward autonomy as yet taken. He was charged
with control over the Air Force Combat Command, successor to the
GHQ Air Force, and over the Air Corps.“ Specifically, his duties in-
cluded determining requirements for the AAF and the “preparation
of necessary plans for the development, organization, equipment,
training, tactical operations, supply, and maintenance thereof, includ-
ing overseas garrisons and task forces for theaters of operations and
the assignment of personnel and mathiel thereto.” ” Through its com-
manding general, he controlled “all aerial operations’’ of the Air Force
Combat Command save for units assigned or attached to task forces,
overseas garrisons, or other commands, and on direction of the Chief
of Staff was responsible for plans for the air defense of the United
* See above, p. I 15.
260

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.