Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y
a single theater; in the summer of 1941both the European Axis and
Japan loomed as probable enemies and responsibilities for hemisphere
defense involved the establishment of widely scattered bases and de-
fense commands. Anglo-American plans had envisaged the establish-
ment of several theaters of operations, but firm commitment of the
field forces must depend in the initial stages of war upon enemy
strategy. Under these circumstances it did not seem wise for either
General Marshall or GHQ to take the field. W a r Plans Division was
never incorporated into GHQ and remained a potential rival to that
staff in spite of the directive of 3 July.86
That directive proved difficult to follow, since some of the func-
tions and powers prescribed therein were contingent upon unpre-
dictable circumstances. From the date of its issue, General McNair
considered the authority granted GHQ unequal to the new respon-
sibilities, and on 2 5 July he requested an extension of his powers. T h e
chief difficulty lay in his lack of control over supplies, a weakness he
thought fatal to effective planning for, and command of, task forces.
Competing with the Navy and lend-lease for material resources, the
W a r Department was unwilling to relinquish its control over this
essential factor. Thus it was with restricted authority that GHQ, in
the months just before and after Pearl Harbor, planned operations and
dispatched task forces, some of which have been mentioned in earlier
passages of this chapter. But however important the matter of supply
may have been to GHQ, the issue of most immediate concern to the
Army air arm was its own relation to the new agency.
That conflict would arise between the air force and a GHQ donii-
nated by ground officers was to be expected; what occurred was no
more than a new phase of the dispute which had defied solution for
two decades. Widespread recognition of the importance of air power
in the European war and General Marshall’s sympathetic attitude to-
ward the Army’s air arm encouraged those officers who were dissatis-
fied with the organizational compromise of 1935. Rather than return
to the public campaign for a separate department of air, they now
directed their efforts toward securing greater powers within the W a r
Department. In these efforts they were opposed by GHQ as they had
earlier been by the General Staff, but the alignment was now less
uneven. T h e appointment of General Arnold as Deputy Chief of Staff
in October 1940 gave him immediate access to the Chief of Staff; and,
if the new office was not in the same chain of command as Arnold’s
2 5 9

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.