Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 370 …Reichers took a route by way of Cairo across central Africa, the South Atlantic, and up…
  • p. 371 …I 0,000 miles separated Miami from Cairo.23An airplane leaving southern Florida traveled 4,000…
  • p. 372 …of Africa and across central Africa to Cairo. Ferrying operations over the South Atlantic route had…
  • p. 375 …Takoradi following the completion of deliveries to Cairo, and for hauling critical items of supply east…
  • p. 378 …7 December the service was extended to Cairo and beyond.54 Before operations could begin, Pan…
  • p. 379 …Maxwell had been established at Cairo on I 3 September 1941, with responsibilities similar to those…
  • p. 380 …to the opening of a service to Cairo over the South Atlantic route. Two survey flights…
  • p. 381 …R Y I N G Washington for Cairo prior to 7 December, each carrying important military…
  • p. 382 …of the bombers departed Bolling Field for Cairo on 20 November. Unfortunately, on the trip across…
  • p. 385 …Lend-lease planes for Russia were flown through Cairo to Basra or to Tehran, where they…
  • p. 387 …for ferrying up the old Cape-to-Cairo airway. Although more exposed to attack, Takoradi and…
  • p. 388 …Tampa-Trinidad- Belem-Natal-Accra-Khartoum-Cairo-Habbaniya-Karachi.At Karachi the LB-3o’s under…
  • p. 390 …24 shuttle services to Great Britain and Cairo. The first step was to establish a ferrying…
  • p. 391 …parts stocked by the RAF a t Cairo, all spare parts had to be shipped from…
  • p. 395 …assembled and then ferried across Africa to Cairo. Within a few months after Pearl Harbor, the…
  • p. 407 …Harbor, first to Britain and later to Cairo, had been little more than courier services and…
  • p. 411 …from their normal operations between Washington and Cairo and sent to the Far East. A plan…
  • p. 412 …Kester-the pilot who had inaugurated the Washington- Cairo transport service in November-was lost off…
  • p. 413 …In February, Transcontinental & Western Air began operating a shuttle service from Washington to Cairo, using two…
  • p. 629 …5) MAGNET (Northern Ireland); (6) Task Force CAIRO (to Egypt).g On 2 7 January the…
  • p. 630 …one group of heavies set up for CAIRO was to go out only after the initial…
  • p. 778 …CM-IN, MA Cairo to M E I D 65. CM-IN, London (Brett) to Trip…
  • p. 779 …1942; CM- IN, Cairo (Fellen) to T A G (Adler for Arnold), 8754 Amseg, 3 Feb…
  • p. 786 …1942; msg. $762, Cairo to T A G , 4 Feb. IWZ; msg. #13, Brett to T…
  • p. 830 …BOLERO BR CAA C/AAF C/AC CAIRO C/AS C A T F CCRC CCS…
  • p. 844 …5 Cagayan (Mindanao), 219 Cagayan Valley, 208 Cairo, 3 1 ~ 2 1 , 325-26, 328-29…
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y
a single theater; in the summer of 1941both the European Axis and
Japan loomed as probable enemies and responsibilities for hemisphere
defense involved the establishment of widely scattered bases and de-
fense commands. Anglo-American plans had envisaged the establish-
ment of several theaters of operations, but firm commitment of the
field forces must depend in the initial stages of war upon enemy
strategy. Under these circumstances it did not seem wise for either
General Marshall or GHQ to take the field. W a r Plans Division was
never incorporated into GHQ and remained a potential rival to that
staff in spite of the directive of 3 July.86
That directive proved difficult to follow, since some of the func-
tions and powers prescribed therein were contingent upon unpre-
dictable circumstances. From the date of its issue, General McNair
considered the authority granted GHQ unequal to the new respon-
sibilities, and on 2 5 July he requested an extension of his powers. T h e
chief difficulty lay in his lack of control over supplies, a weakness he
thought fatal to effective planning for, and command of, task forces.
Competing with the Navy and lend-lease for material resources, the
W a r Department was unwilling to relinquish its control over this
essential factor. Thus it was with restricted authority that GHQ, in
the months just before and after Pearl Harbor, planned operations and
dispatched task forces, some of which have been mentioned in earlier
passages of this chapter. But however important the matter of supply
may have been to GHQ, the issue of most immediate concern to the
Army air arm was its own relation to the new agency.
That conflict would arise between the air force and a GHQ donii-
nated by ground officers was to be expected; what occurred was no
more than a new phase of the dispute which had defied solution for
two decades. Widespread recognition of the importance of air power
in the European war and General Marshall’s sympathetic attitude to-
ward the Army’s air arm encouraged those officers who were dissatis-
fied with the organizational compromise of 1935. Rather than return
to the public campaign for a separate department of air, they now
directed their efforts toward securing greater powers within the W a r
Department. In these efforts they were opposed by GHQ as they had
earlier been by the General Staff, but the alignment was now less
uneven. T h e appointment of General Arnold as Deputy Chief of Staff
in October 1940 gave him immediate access to the Chief of Staff; and,
if the new office was not in the same chain of command as Arnold’s
2 5 9

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.