Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 125 …an invading army. For that job they were well equipped, trained, and organized. Though the Luftwaff…
  • p. 127 …For the first time, German parachute troops were successfully employed when the Nazi forces invaded Holland…
  • p. 131 …equipment for moving an invading force across the intervening waters. The army itself, caught unprepared, required…
  • p. 134 …By the first of June the British had been forced to yield Crete to the invaders…
  • p. 183 …Nevertheless, a land army should be prepared to invade the continent and Germany itself. T h…
  • p. 246 …this effort." Apparently the course of the invaders plotted earlier in the morning was not utilized…
  • p. 263 …tanks, but they too “strafed and restrafed the invaders.” As Lt. Samuel H. Marrett, squadron commander…
  • p. 461 …the invading forces was merely preliminary to the bringing in of bombers in preparation for the…
  • p. 493 …Its nickel and chrome mines were readily accessible to an invader. Admiral King believed that the…
  • p. 522 …after the action; not until the war ended and the teams of interrogators invaded Japan was…
  • p. 529 …There was no intention of invading the Alaskan mainland, or even Dutch Harbor; the objective was…
  • p. 535 …Four of the most efficient carriers had gone down, carrying with them the hopes of Admiral…
  • p. 559 …the latter presented the more immediate need for reinforcement. Tavoy had fallen to Japanese invaders as…
  • p. 630 …The Netherlands East Indies and Burma, already invaded, were doomed. T h e Indian Ocean was…
  • p. 633 …to the preliminary strategic bombardment and only modestly to direct support of the invading force. A…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
of opinion as to the most feasible solution for each. The reorganiza-
tion of March 1942 was essentially a compromise, a wartime expedient
which postponed rather than effected a final settlement. The imme-
diate background of this temporary solution may be sought in a three-
cornered struggle between the General Staff‘s War Plans Division,
General Headquarters, and the Army Air Forces. Much, though cer-
tainly not all, of the controversy turned on the relation of the air
arm to the military establishment.
General Headquarters was of recent origin, but the desirability of
such a staff in the event of war had long dominated Army thought.
The Harbord Board of 192I , drawing on the experience of the AEF
in 1917-18, had recommended establishment of a staff comparable to
Pershing’s GHQ which should channel War Department activities
into the theater of operations. T h e core of this headquarters was to
consist of the General Staff’s War Plans Division-indeed it was in
anticipation of such an eventual function that the latter office had been
created and charged with the preparation of over-all strategic plans.
Modified in detail in 1936, the Harbord plan assumed that a t outbreak
of war the Chief of Staff, or some other commander designated by
the President, would lead the field forces with a reinforced WPD as
his general headquarters. When Nazi victories of the spring of 1940
lent urgency to the mobilization of American military forces, an
initial step toward realizing this design was taken by the activation, on
2 6 July, of a “nucleus of GHQ.” Its original mission was to direct the
training of the tactical units of the Army, found in the main in the
four field armies, the armored force, and the GHQ Air Force.* Gen-
eral Marshall delegated effective control of GHQ to its chief of staff,
Brig. Gen. Leslie J. McNair, under whose able leadership a small group
of officers undertook the complex task of organizing and training the
fast-growing Army.84
A year later, on 3 July 1941,the mission of GHQ was extended to
include also the planning and command of operations; in General
Marshall’s words, “GHQ now supersedes War Plans Division in the
organization and control of task forces and operations.” 8 5 This was in
accord with the original intent, but the new arrangement did not
prove satisfactory. T h e Harbord report and the subsequent modifica-
tions of 1936 had conceived of a war involving a concerted effort in
* The last term is confusing, since it referred to an organization which had been
established in 1935, five years before the activation of GHQ itself.
258

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.