Documents / Document
This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.
“King”32 pages
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y theater or continental commander. Yet to an important degree the broad direction of the war strategy was the work of the Combined Chiefs themselves. This meant, save for the final decision by the civil- ian government chiefs, that the war effort was controlled by a com- mittee. T h e faults inherent in committee rule were not always absent. It is difficult to achieve perfect unanimity of opinion among eight strong-minded men, each accustomed to command and each moti- vated by a different combination of national, service, and personal factors. Yet on each issue, agreement-or consent-was desirable; there was no formal voting or majority rule. In view of the paralyzing possibilities of what amounted to the liberum veto, it was fortunate that, whatever clashes of opinion may have occurred, the members of the CCS were able in most issues to compromise their several sug- gestions in a decision that could be accepted by all. One fact of ex- treme importance for the United States was that the membership of the Joint Chiefs of Staff remained unchanged, after the appointment of Admiral Leahy, until after the war ended; this continuity in per- sonnel, so unusual in a military body, contributed much to smoothness of operation of the JCS. In the interests of efficiency it was desirable that the Combined Chiefs of Staff be provided with permanent staff sections. T h e British paper on post-ARCADIA collaboration had designated several of the required agencies, again based on British models, and these were set up by CCS directives at the time that body achieved its formal organization. For the most part the new offices merely continued, in a more formal guise and under new designations, the machinery which had grown up at ARCADIA. T h e form the new sections assumed then was that of Anglo-American committees rather than of the conventional “G’s” of the U.S. Army General Staff. Although there was no hierarchical arrangement of the several sec- tions, those being coequal in status and on terms of mutual inter- change of communication, the Combined Planning Staff occupied a central position v i s - h i s the Combined Chiefs of Staff .78 That section, which had operated at ARCADIA as the Joint Planning Committee, was charged with preparing such studies and plans as the CCS should direct. Its membership included the chief planning officers of the U.S. Army, Navy, and AAF, and similar representatives of the British services. T h e American members, when sitting separately, constituted also the US.Joint Planning Staff. 2 5 s
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.