Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
tations among military staffs, so that the plans and operations of each
will fit into a general strategy designed to crush the enemy." 6 9
The vast amount of important business accomplished at ARCADIA
gave evidence of the utility of periodic meetings of government chiefs
with their principal military and civilian advisers. Hence there
followed, after the pattern set at the Atlantic conference and
ARCADIA, a series of meetings, from Casablanca to Potsdam, a t
which the major issues of the war were settled. In some of the con-
ferences, the Soviet Union, China, and other United Nations partici-
pated, but usually the function of the meetings was to serve as a
clearing house for Anglo-American plans. Ultimate decisions on major
military policies were taken by President Roosevelt, as Commander
in Chief of the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime
Minister and Minister of Defense. Each of those leaders was inclined
to assume a more active part in framing military strategy than was
conventional with civilian officials in their respective states, and it was
highly desirable that they be served by a common staff organization.
The basic elements for such a body existed already in the U.S. Joint
Board and the British Chiefs of Staff Committee, with their staff
organizations, but inasmuch as those bodies sat respectively a t Wash-
ington and London, some practical form of liaison was required. In
ABC-I it had been suggested that this be achieved by the exchange
of permanent military missions. The suggestion had been carried out
in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special Observer Group
in London and the British Joint Staff Mission in Washington." There
remained the task of perfecting this initial machinery, including the
subsidiary staff agencies, and of regularizing procedures. These goals
were achieved during the weeks following the Washington confer-
ence, and during the same period significant changes occurred in the
organization and command structure of the armed forces of the
United States. T o some extent the latter changes were brought about
by conditions peculiar to the U.S. services, but they were profoundly
influenced by the new Anglo-American staff organization. And in
each case the status of the AAF was improved.
In consonance with their previously declared interest, the British
chiefs of staff on 10 January presented to their American opposite
numbers a memorandum on post-ARCADIA c~llaboration.~~The
paper, suggesting the establishment of a permanent staff organization,
was discussed in detail, revised by the U.S. chiefs of staff, and at the
2 5 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.