Documents / Document
This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.
“Churchill”21 pages
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y to be subject to periodic readjustments when changes in attrition rates, in production estimates, or in planned deployments warranted recon- sideration. T h e rigidity of this schedule appeared to some allocations experts sufficient to make the scheme impractical in the light of so many variable but the readjustment feature was to be its saving grace. When in February 1942 the combined Munitions As- signments Board was established,” the Arnold-Portal Agreement was accepted “for production planning purposes,” 5 6 and it served as a point of departure for later revisions. This agreement, it must be noted, was only bilateral. Existing commitments by each of the signators to other powers were still in force. For the United States the most im- portant of these was the Soviet protocol, which remained the guide for deliveries to the U.S.S.R. until replaced by the Washington pro- tocol in autumn 1942.~’ T h e increase in the number of aircraft scheduled for delivery to the AAF under the Victory Program called for a parallel expansion of the whole air organization. This meant an increase in the total troop basis, in the training program, and in the number of organized units. When war came, the AAF had an authorized strength of 348,535 officers and men.58 Its training establishment was geared to an annual rate of 37,000 pilots and I 10,000 technicians. This training schedule reflected the needs of the &-group program, which had been publicly an- nounced on 2 3 October but accomplishment of which had been ef- fectively blocked by the shortage of combat planes. Of the 84 groups authorized, 70 had been activated, but in many cases little had been done beyond formal a~tivation.~’Relatively few of the groups were a t table-of-organization strength in men, and few were fully equipped with modern aircraft. T h e Air Staff was faced with the problem of devising an orderly schedule which would provide aircrews and or- H.B. M.B. L.B. Pursuit Observation Transport Sept. 43 2 0 0 249 400 I 0 0 48 73 2 00 257 400 I 0 0 46 92 I 0 0 281 3 50 94 38 I 49 589 ‘744 2745 4050 402 852 - Oct. Nov. Dee. __ - -400-182 __ 1 1 1 I 0 0 - The above allocation will be subject to readjustment a t a later date when attrition rates, changes in production figures or changes in number of units in combat areas make it advisable. The assignment of models to conform to the allocation listed above as attached hereto is also agreed upon. The allocation of trainers will be dealt with separately. See below, pp. 256-57. 249
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.