Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 12 …And, until an opportuniry for fuller study was offered, it would serve as an interim history…
  • p. 182 …ies.“~Even in the absence of a fuller report on the conference it was obvious to…
  • p. 185 …they pre- sented an operational plan much fuller in detail and more elaborately * See above, pp…
  • p. 298 …Allocation among the several United Nations was reserved for a fuller study of the problems involved…
  • p. 557 …This deploy- ment promised better protection for the exposed cities of unoccupied China, and a fuller…
  • p. 643 …A fuller treat- ment of this decision will appear in Volume IV. t See above, pp…
  • p. 819 …For fuller discussion of problem of production priorities, see AAF Reference History No. 18, The Early…
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y
precedence to heavy bombers for defense in this hemisphere and in
the Pacific; and in the air assault on Germany, precedence over equip-
ment for air support of a large ground force. T h e design for expansion
suggested in AWPD/ I was not incompatible with those suggestions,
and the air requirements of that plan, as revised in London in Sep-
tember, were adopted as the general guide for production.
O n 3 January President Roosevelt sent Mr. Stimson a list of muni-
tions, with a directive that he achieve the schedules contained therein
and consult with the Secretary of the Navy as to allocation between
the using services. No relative priorities were suggested. Aircraft goals
were as
Aircraft T y p e s
Target
Monthly
1942 I 943 Production
Long-range, heavy, and medium bombers I 1 , 3 0 0 3O@Q 3 P J O
Light, dive, and scout bombers I 1,000 I 7,000 2 , 0 0 0
Observation and transports -6,700 I 5,000 1 ,500
Pursuits 16,000 38,000 3,500
Total combat 45,000 100,ooo IO,OOO
I 5,000 3 1,000
G R A N D T O T A L S 60,000 I 3 I ,000
For 1942,this meant increasing existing schedules from about 46,000
to 60,000. T h e figures for 1943 differed slightly from those sent to
Congress by the President on 6 January, which called for 25,000 rather
than 31,000 trainer^.'^ In either case they seemed prodigious, espe-
cially in view of equally impressive requirements for ground and naval
warfare. With any reasonably calculated rate of wastage, the annual
production schedules of 60,000 and I 3 1,000 aircraft should easily
meet the requirements agreed on a t London-about 60,000 combat and
37,000 training planes for the AAF and 21,000 for the U.S. Navy,
plus the British deficit of 13,553.
At the suggestion of the AAF, the following schedule of allocations
of combat planes was agreed on by the U.S. services, and approved by
the President on 14 January:”
__
-Trainers
1942 1943
Aircraft T y p e s A r m y N a v y Total Army N a v y Total
Long-range, heavy, and medium
bombers 9,780 1 , 5 2 0 11,300 26,190 3,810 30,000
Light, dive, torpedo, and scout
bombers 7 , 2 7 0 3,730 11,000 9,160 7,840 17,000
Pursuits 14,350 1,650 16,000 30,600 7,400 38,000
3,430 3 , 3 2 0 6,750 12,260 2,740 15,000_ _ _ _ _Observation and transports
T O T A L S 34,830 10,220 45,050 78,210 21,790 100,000
247

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.