Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
additional arrangements had to be made to protect lines of communi-
cation from those countries and within the theater.
The task of providing reinforcements in combat units and addi-
tional supplies was not a simple one. In electing to concentrate Anglo-
American efforts first against the Nazis, the chiefs of staff had
accepted the corollary that “only the minimum of forces necessary for
the safeguarding of vital interests in other theaters should be diverted
from Germany.” 3 2 The pitiful inadequacy of Allied strength in the
Far East made imperative, even under these restrictions, the immediate
dispatch thither of such minimum forces. Even so, there was in Wash-
ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation
to justify firm commitments. The disposition of additional forces
must hinge upon a number of contingencies-particularly upon the
situation in Luzon, Singapore, and the Netherlands East Indies at
such time as the reinforcements should arrive.33 Among the U.S.
chiefs of staff there was a natural desire-prompted by humanitarian,
strategic, and political considerations-to send aid to MacArthur’s
beleaguered army. In the course of the ARCADIA conversations,
however, it became apparent that such assistance could not be sent
directly to the Philippines. The exact day of that decision is difficult
to determine, but before the conference closed it was accepted that
the only hope was to channel reinforcements up through Australia,
and that hope grew progressively dimmer.” 3 4 In the absence of naval
supremacy, there was little utility in planting ground force garrisons
in the Malay barrier in spots which the enemy might easily by-pass.
The string of island bases which constituted the vital but tenuous air
link between Hawaii and Australia did require troops for local de-
fense. New Zealand was assigned responsibility for Fiji, and Australia
for the ultimate protection of New Caledonia; but it was necessary
for the United States to provide a large ground force immediately
for the latter island.35Otherwise the prime necessity was for an early
and substantial increase in air power-for local defense of the islands
and for a striking force farther west. The AAF had-en route, at
U.S. ports of embarkation, or earmarked for early dispatch to the
Far East-a number of air units and about 400 planes.36Actually the
chief difficulty lay in the shortage of shipping rather than of aircraft
or crews; for, whereas heavy bombers could be ferried out, lighter
planes and their crews, ground personnel, and supplies must proceed
* See above, pp. 232-33.
242

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.