Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y
effort required in terms of forces and shipping, no firm decision had
been reached when the ARCADIA conference closed. Active plan-
ning for the operation continued throughout January and February."
T h e plan was shelved on 3 only to be revived in the summer
in preparation for the invasion of November 1942.
Insofar as the Atlantic-European theaters were concerned, then,
the Japanese attacks had done little to modify the strategic ideas of
spring 1941,either in respect to over-all priorities or to specific de-
ployments. In the Pacific the situation had been altered radically by
the events of December; and, if the Anglo-American strategists were
unwilling to forsake their basic concepts for the war against Japan,
they had to re-examine the means by which those concepts might be
put to test. Discussion by the Anglo-American chiefs of staff centered
around three fundamental problems: a reconsideration of the nature
of the strategic defense against Japan; the allocation of forces and
shipping for that defense; and the establishment of an effective system
of command over the widely scattered forces of the several United
Nations. These problems were intimately related, and any ready solu-
tion was complicated by the whirlwind advance of the enemy, by
the poverty of our intelligence concerning his intentions and capa-
bilities, and by the primitive communications system upon which the
widely scattered forces were dependent.
Eventual victory over Japan was contingent on the development
of forward bases from which the heart of the empire could be hit.
For the immediate future the best that could be hoped for was to
maintain security of defensive base areas, to keep open the lines of
communication, and to encourage Chinese resistance.29 Defense of
the central and eastern Pacific areas devolved upon the United States
alone. There seemed little likelihood of an attack in force upon the
western coast of the United States,30and reinforcements were avail-
able for Alaska and Hawaii. T h e most urgent requirement was for
the Far East area, and on 3 1 December the Anglo-American chiefs
of staff agreed on a general policy for that region3' Essentially the
plan called for a defense in depth of the Malay barrier, with air and
naval forces operating in advance of that line to retard the southward
drive of the enemy. Australia and Burma were to serve as the sup-
porting base areas. To conserve shipping, supplies were to be found
locally to the extent possible, but since the great bulk of forces and
munitions must be brought from the United States and from England,
24'

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.