Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
of March 1942.l~T h e force set up for Northern Ireland was much
greater than that stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request,
U.S. troops were to relieve British troops then garrisoned in Northern
Ireland and were to be wholly responsible for the defense of that area
rather than merely of U.S. bases there as previously agreed. This
move, in addition to releasing British troops for service in more active
theaters, seemed politically expedient in view of Eire’s attitude toward
the war. A new plan for this project, MAGNET, was approved on
11 January.lg It called for the dispatch of the V Corps (reinforced)
plus air and supply organizations. The first sizable contingent landed
a t Belfast on 26 January,20 but because of more immediate needs in
the Pacific, the movement was thereafter retarded. The air contingent
was not scheduled for movement until late spring.
The one European task force which was designed for early offen-
sive action was the AAF bombardment force which, according to
prewar plans, was to join the RAF in the attack on Germany. This
project was approved informally at the first of the ARCADIA ses-
sions, and reaffirmed on 1 3 January.’l The movement should begin
“as soon as these forces and shipping become available.” In view of
the desperate need for aircraft and crews in the Pacific and for the
expanded training program, immediate deployment was impossible.
Current opinion that the initial heavy bomber groups might move
out in March 2 2 was to prove too optimistic.
A plan for movements within the Western Hemisphere adopted on
I 3 January 2 3 involved for the moment less shipping. It was agreed
that, subject to the consent of the Netherlands government, U.S.
troops should replace British garrisons in Aruba and Curaqao, and
that the United States should continue to hold forces in reserve for
the security of northeast Brazil against possible Axis thmsts.’*
The most ambitious project considered for the first half of 1942
was the joint occupation of French Northwest and/or North Africa.
Before Pearl Harbor, the U.S. Joint Board had worked tentatively
on plans for the seizure of Dakar (JPB BLACK) and Casablanca
(GYMNAST) to forestall any German move toward the South
Atlantic and South America.25The British meanwhile had been think-
ing of a possible landing in Tunisia, and at ARCADIA the joint
planners were directed to weld the two concepts into a single plan
(SUPER-GYMNAST) .26 In view of the many unpredictable factors
involved in so complex an operation, and in view of the scale of
240

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.