Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y
Against the decision to concentrate first against Hitler, with all the
priorities implied by that choice, was balanced the very pressing need
for reinforcement of the Philippines and of other positions in the Far
East. The limiting factor was not only-perhaps not principally-the
number of troops available. T h e shipping shortage which was to re-
main a brake on projected operations throughout much of the war
made impossible the immediate deployment of all those units which
were trained and equipped for action." But in spite of the over-all
priority given to the European war, some reinforcements had to be
sent to the Pacific, and because of the immense distances involved in
deploying troops in that area, it was only by adroit juggling of trans-
port facilities that even barest necessities could be met.
One inevitable but ironical concomitant of the primacy given to
the European theater was the knowledge that U.S. ground units sent
in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major
invasion of the continent was contemplated for 1942, though it was
considered expedient to hold in reserve forces which might take
advantage of any radical change in the situation. Hence it was that
most of the movements and projects designed for the Atlantic-
European theaters during the first half of that year were those prepar-
atory and precautionary deployments which had been set up in
RAINBOW No. 5 . T h e lesser movements to the Pacific bore, on the
contrary, the stamp of urgency. A more detailed discussion of some
of these projects in both Atlantic and Pacific will follow in appro-
priate chapters; here it is sufficient to list briefly the points at issue
and the decisions made.
T h e most considerable deployments in the Atlantic-European area
were those which had been designated in the prewar plans for the
British Isles and Iceland. T h e decision to substitute U.S. Army troops
for US. Marines and British troops in Iceland and for the British
garrison in Northern Ireland imposed severe demands upon combined
shipping facilities." Each move, however, offered important advan-
tages. Marines would be made available for projected amphibious
operations, and British troops would be released for service in the
Middle East, where they in turn would relieve Australian units needed
for the defense of their own homeland. T h e movement of U.S. Army
forces to Iceland had begun in August 1941,*:but because of the tight
shipping situation that project was not completed by the target date
* See above, pp. 158-60.
2 3 9

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.