Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
quate strength of the U.S. armed forces, to our materiel commitments
to England and the Soviet Union, and to the vast naval and military
responsibilities which the British had elsewhere. But there was also
an underestimation of Japanese capabilities both by commanders in
the Far East and by leaders in Washington and London, and what-
ever alarm may have been entertained over Japanese threats toward
the south, there seems to have been little doubt of the ability of the
associated powers to implement the strategy described in ABC-I .
The overwhelming strength of the Japanese army was recognized,
but inasmuch as its southward movement must be by sea, we counted
on neutralizing, if not wholly containing, that strength by Allied
naval and air striking forces. Initial Japanese successes cut at the very
roots of this concept. By 10 December, the enemy had destroyed or
immobilized the heavy units of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, had sunk the
newly arrived British warships Repulse and Prince of Wales, and had
wiped out in large part our air strength in Luzon and Oahu. Manila
and Hong Kong, already under attack, were doomed, and the drive
for Singapore had begun. With their striking power crippled and
their main bases rendered ineffective, the associated powers could
offer little resistance as the enemy pushed on pell-mell for the Neth-
erlands East Indies. The swiftness of that rush was hardly appreciated
in the first few days of the war, but already it was obvious that pre-
war plans must be reviewed.
Meanwhile RAINBOW No. 5, as revised in November, was in-
voked-against Japan on 7 December, against Germany and Italy on
the I I th-but with the proviso that Army task forces would be desig-
nated and dispatched only in accord with subsequent W a r Department
instructions.‘ Within the Air Staff there was an immediate, though
momentary, reaction in favor of deploying all available air strength
for defense of the Western Hemisphere and, if practicable, of Hawaii
and the Philippines.? Within a week, however, AAF planners returned
to a more familiar theme with a new long-term design for offensive
war. This plan, called AWPD/4 ( I 5 December 1941) was hardly
more than a restatement of the salient features of AWPD/I, with
requirements somewhat inflated under the stimulus of war. It called
for an air force of some 3,000,000 men and 90,000 planes, to be
achieved by “giving NATIONAL FIRST PRIORITY TO THE
PRODUCTION OF AIRCRAFT.” * This plan was not accepted.
It was clear that the role of the AAF could be determined only in
2 36

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.