Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
F U N D A M E N T A L B A S E S O F S T R A T E G Y
almost perfect unanimity of the vote in the Congress on our declara-
tion of war was symptomatic of the national temper.’ This did not
mean that criticism of the administration’s policies was completely
hushed-within a month after Pearl Harbor the basic war strategy
was under fire from intransigents in the press and in the Congress-
but the nation as a whole began to gird itself for a war effort on a
scale hitherto unprecedented.
If the national reaction to Pearl Harbor boded ill for the Axis
powers, there was still little cause for early optimism in the United
States. Indeed, the success of the Japanese attacks threatened momen-
tarily to disrupt the whole trend of our strategic thinking. T h e plans
which had been worked out in collaboration with the British earlier
in 1941had bccn oriented toward Germany. The Tripartite Pact ( 2 7
September 1940) had strengthened the belief that Japan would join
Germany should that nation go to war with the United States, but
Anglo-American military leaders considered it possible to contain
Japan by a strategic defensive until the defeat of Germany would
allow full force to be applied in the Pacific. From 1938 the United
States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em-
bargoes, but until summer of 1941 the administration had not been
so outspoken in its denunciation of Japanese activities as of German.
T h e President’s radio address of 2 7 May 1941,announcing the proc-
lamation of an unlimited national emergency, is indicative of this
policy: it was most frank in its description of the dangers we faced
from Hider’s government, but it contained no direct reference to
Japan.‘ To gain time for completing our defense measures, the ad-
ministration continued to negotiate through normal channels with
Japan until that nation began, late in July, to threaten southern Indo-
China. A Japanese move in that direction would have isolated the
Philippines and menaced both the Netherlands East Indies and lines
of communication essential to the security of Great Britain itself.
Immediately the United States began to stiffen its p ~ l i c y , ~and at the
Atlantic conference in mid-August the President and Prime Minister
agreed to act along parallel lines in warning Japan.‘ From there on,
relations between the United States and Japan steadily worsened until
by 2 6 November they had reached a crisis.5 Hurried steps had been
taken to reinforce American outposts in the Pacific, and by the British
to improve the defenses of Singapore. In each case the efforts were
limited in nature. T o a large extent this was due to the as yet inade-
235

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.