Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the possibilities in the situation confronting the associated powers, he
emphasized the necessity for a defensive strategy until such time as
sufficient forces had been brought together for offensive operations
“(a) by working from Burma into China towards Shanghai to acquire
advanced bases; (b) by exerting slow pressure through the Nether-
lands East Indies and Malaya; and (c) by exerting similar pressure
from Australia into the islands to the North.” O n the following day
he ordered the Holbrook and Bloemfontein, the only vessels so far
dispatched to MacArthur, to put in a t Darwin and to discharge their
cargo and all troops a t that port.lo4
By this time the War Department, too, held grave doubts as to the
feasibility of sending substantial reinforcements to the Philippines. It
was clear that a reservoir of supply could not be built up in Australia
except over a period of many months. Hope of ferrying short-range
planes to the Philippines declined with each report of the progress
of Japanese forces, and the prospect of breaking through the sea
blockade with a naval escort for convoys was even less promising.
President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs
of staff, then meeting in Washington, had considered such an opera-
tion. But the US. Navy had been hard hit at Pearl Harbor, the bal-
ance of naval power in the Pacific had been further upset in Japan’s
favor by loss of the British Prince of Wales and the Repulse to enemy
bombers on 10 December, and forces already committed to the Atlan-
tic and Middle East theaters could not be released within the time
available.” A memorandum of 3 January for the Chief of Staff signed
by Brig. Gen. Leonard T. Gerow, Assistant Chief of Staff, outlined
the operations that would be required to restore the American posi-
tion in the Philippines. The first requirement would be to gain air
and naval superiority south of the line Malaya-Borneo-Celebes and
to make preparations for extending this control northward. With air
supremacy established in the Netherlands East Indies, it would be
necessary to extend this supremacy from NEI bases northward to
cover Mindanao, and then with the support of strong naval and air
forces to land large ground forces on Mindanao preparatory to a
drive into Luzon. The associated powers commanded of course
neither the time nor the means for such an operation as this, and on
the basis of an unavoidable conclusion that “the forces required for
the relief of the Philippines cannot be placed in the Far East area
# See below, pp. 239-43.
2 3 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.