Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
after dark at the now much-bombed Del Monte field, from which four
of them took off again shortly after midnight for Lingayen Gulf,
almost 600 miles away. Again visibility was poor and although trans-
ports were bombed, no hits were observed. The Japanese put up a
barrage of antiaircraft fire which did no damage, but enemy fighters
pursued with such persistence that the bombers could not land at San
Marcelino as had been planned. Instead, they headed for Australia.
One of the planes came down for refueling at an emergency field at
San Jose in Mindoro; the other three reached the Dutch base at
Amboina before landing. By 24 December all nine aircraft, five pro-
ceeding directly from Del Monte, had returned to Batchelor Field.85
Meanwhile, another flight from Australia, this time of three heavy
bombers, had arrived at Del Monte. There on 24 December the air-
craft were loaded each with 2 , 1 0 0 gallons of gasoline and 7 x 300-lb.
bombs in preparation for a mission against Davao. T w o of the planes
then bombed the Davao airfield from 15,000 feet, and shortly there-
after the third attacked shipping in the Davao harbor. All three planes
returned to Darwin, though two of them had sustained considerable
damage.sa
The pursuit planes in their daily reconnaissance missions continued
to report the steady advance of the enemy from the north and addi-
tional landings along the Luzon coast. Against one of these landings,
in San Miguel Bay on the southeast coast, the Interceptor Command
decided on 2 3 December to throw virtually all its remaining aircraft.
Attrition had cut down the 24th Group’s striking power to a total of
twelve P-40’s and six P-35’s, but they proved sufficient to create a grati-
fying confusion among enemy personnel in landing barges and around
supply dumps ashore. The Japanese put up a heavy screen of antiair-
craft fire. One P-35 was forced into a crash landing, and an explosive
bullet, shattering the windscreen of Lieutenant Wagner‘s P-40, well-
nigh blinded him.’’ The American effort was in”effect a last gesture
of defiance, for following this mission all aj, ‘force units received
instructions to evacuate currently held Luzon bases as a part of the
general withdrawal to Bataan. The evacuation began on 24 December.
Typical of the confusion which naturally reached its climax in this
withdrawal was the experience of the 27th Group, whose personnel
had suffered the particularly galling experience of being caught in the
front line of war without their planes. On 18 December the group had
been deprived of its commander when Maj. John M.Davies, together
2 2 4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.