Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
P E A R L H A R B O R A N D C L A R K F I E L D
tageous” to have 2 0 0 pursuit and 50 dive bombers delivered to the
Philippines by aircraft carrier. Fields for these planes he felt could be
maintained satisfactorily, and he pointed out that airdrome construc-
tion following the outbreak of war had been accelerated. His engineers
had reported that Clark, Nichols, San Marcelino, and Del Carmen
fields on Luzon could be maintained in operating condition, and that
some eight or ten additional strips would be ready by the last of
December.”
Nor had Washington abandoned plans for support of the Philip-
pines. President Roosevelt specifically directed that reinforcements
should be sent there with all speed, and MacArthur was informed on
I 5 December not only that the strategic importance of the Philippines
was fully recognized but that there would be no wavering in the deter-
mination to provide support. In partial fulfilment of the promise, the
dispatch of sixty-five new heavy bombers had been authorized in
addition to fifteen LB-~o’srepossessed from the British, a transfer to
be completed by 2 1 February 1942, and MacArthur was further
informed on 2 3 December that these planes, to be ferried via the South
Atlantic and India,” would come under his control at Bangal~re.’~
It soon became evident, however, that the time factor outweighed
all others. T h e Japanese were pressing down from their northern land-
ings; in the south the city of Davao, with its fifth column of some
30,000 Japanese, was easily overrun on 2 0 December; and by that date
the heavy elements of the Japanese Second Fleet had moved north to
cover the main enemy landing on 2 0 - 2 I December at Lingayen Gulf.
MacArthur’s strategy against this assault was based upon a plan which
“had been on the books” for many years. It consisted of delaying
actions in central Luzon and a retreat to Bataan where, it was hoped,
the limited forces available would serve as a buffer for C o r r e g i d ~ r . ~ ~
Except for reconnaissance missions carried out by pursuit pilots,
the air force could offer little support to the hard pressed infantry in
this withdrawal. From its distant base at Darwin the 19th Group
undertook on 2 2 December to mount a mission of nine B-17’s in
accordance with a plan to use Del Monte as a staging point for refuel-
ing and rearming. Having taken off from Batchelor Field, they swept
over Davao Gulf at sunset and dropped 3 0 x 500-lb. bombs on a
cluster of seven ships. No pursuit or A A interfered with the attack,
but visibility was poor and results were negligible. The B-17’s landed
* See below, pp. 331-33.
2 2 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.