Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I I
Montgomery, proceeded toward the enemy beachhead a t Vigan.
O’Donnell, first to arrive over the target area, made several runs at
2 5 , 0 0 0 feet against what was mistakenly thought to be an aircraft
carrier. Mechanical trouble with the bomb racks as well as antiaircraft
fire interfered with the bombing, and it took approximately forty-five
minutes to drop eight 600-lb. bombs. No hits were observed. Parse1
had better success. He made two bomb runs from 12,500 feet. On the
first, four 300-lb. bombs were directed against a cruiser or destroyer
without effect, but of the three bombs dropped during the second run,
a t least one direct hit on a transport was claimed. Montgomery had
been allowed time to load only one 600-lb. bomb when he was ordered
off Clark Field for the security of his plane. He proceeded to Vigan,
however, and dropped his bomb in the water near the t r a n s p o r t ~ . ~ ~
The two remaining B-17’s took off from Clark Field at approximately
0930 to attack Japanese landing craft, transports, and their naval escort
near Aparri. Lt. G.E. Schaetzel, pilot of one of the planes, in making
a run over several transports at 2 5 , 0 0 0 feet, apparently scored a hit.
The B-17, pounded by antiaircraft fire and under attack by enemy
pursuit, was severely damaged, but no one in the bomber was injured
and Schaetzel succeeded in reaching San Marcelino.64
Capt. Colin Kelly in the fifth bomber had been directed to locate
and if possible sink an aircraft carrier previously reported along the
northern Luzon coast. After a search of the target area he found no
sign of a carrier, but Lt. Joe M. Bean, his navigator, had spotted a large
Japanese warship which the aircrew took for a battles hi^.^^ Indeed,
early reports of the ensuing action placed the ship in either the Harzlrna
or the Yawisbiro class.66Actually, it is now known that no Japanese
battleship participated in the initial invasion of the Philippines, and
that the Haruna, the favored choice in subsequent reports, was
engaged until I 8 December in support of the Malayan campaign. Since
training in identification of naval craft was imperfect and many Japa-
nese cruisers were as long or longer than some American battleships,
it is not surprising that such mistakes of identification were made, even
by the presumably better-trained Navy air personnel. At any rate,
Navy PBY’s claimed on the following day to have hit a ship of the
H a m a class in this same general area. Japanese sources indicate that
the ship picked out by Lieutenant Bean was in fact the heavy cruiser
Ashigara, flagship of the Third Fleet in its current operation.6T
As it moved slowly on the outskirts of the enemy convoy it made a
2 16

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.