Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R 11
vulnerable, and in the early evening of 8 December a machine-gun
battery of the 60th Coast Artillery (AA) moved to Nichols Field and
the port area of Manila. Additional if limited equipment was available
in the Philippine Ordnance Depot, and 500 officers and men were
transferred from the 200th Coast Artillery Regiment to man it. Work-
ing almost continuously for thirty-six hours, these men, who had been
hastily organized into the Provisional 200th CA (AA), put together
and installed twelve 3-inch guns, “3 directors and height-finders, 5
AA searchlight units,” and twelve 37-mm. AA guns. By 10 December
new 3-inch batteries were located a t Paranaque, at Paco, and east of
Nielson Airport, and 37-mm. batteries had been installed a t Nichols
Field, a t Nielson Airport, and in the section of Manila known as the
Walled City.57
While these defensive preparations continued and ground crews
worked frantically to make every available aircraft ready for opera-
tion, the chief responsibility of the air arm was reconnaissance. Though
principal reliance was placed in AAF pursuits and Navy patrol
bombers, B-17’s from Del Monte also participated in the effort to gain
intelligence of the enemy’s movements and intentions. At 0730 on 9
December, six of the heavy bombers, commanded by Maj, Cecil
Combs and loaded each with 20 x Ioo-lb. demolition bombs, took off
from their Mindanao base. Having reconnoitered the area in the
vicinity of Catanduanes without finding evidence of enemy activity,
they proceeded to Clark Field, where they landed at 1430.In an action
which was representative of the desperate conditions now governing
operations from bases on Luzon, the planes took off almost imme-
diately and remained in the air until after dark to avoid attack on the
ground. During the afternoon, seven additional B- I 7’s were dispatched
from Del Monte to San marcel in^.^^ A relatively respectable striking
force had thus been brought into position for resistance to such inva-
sion attempts as might be made. Through the first two days of hos-
tilities, however, reports both from the warning net and from patrol
planes revealed principally the confused and nervous state into which
our defenses had been thrown by the enemy. As Admiral Hart later
reported, “an extraordinary crop of incorrect enemy information”
came over the warning net, and there were reports of “enemy sight-
ings when nothing was actually sighted and when a vessel was really
seen she was usually reported in one of two categories: irrespective of
size, she was either a Transport or a Battleship.776sBut during the
2’4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.