Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
P-~o’s,which numbered perhaps twelve, reached their base a t Iba just
ahead of a heavy enemy attack. The American planes, in fact, were
slowly circling the field preparatory to landing when a number of
Japanese bombers estimated a t from twenty-seven to thirty-four and
their fighter escort attacked. The American planes tried to ward off
the Japanese attack and succeeded in preventing the low-level strafing
which proved so destructive at Clark Field. Lt. Jack Donalson prob-
ably destroyed two of the enemy planes, but five P-40’S were shot
down and three others crash-landed on near-by beaches when their
fuel gave
On the ground, personnel of the Far East Air Force fought back as
best they could in a hopelessly unequal struggle. Though some units
almost completely disintegrated during nearly two hours of attack,
there were countless examples of outstanding leadership and heroism.
With few exceptions, antiaircraft gunners stood by their guns in the
face of effective enemy strafing. Ground and combat crews turned the
machine guns of grounded planes on low-flying Japanese aircraft, or
undertook to rescue from flaming buildings such valuable equipment
as they could. Among the many officers and men subsequently cited
for their efforts were Lt. Fred Crimmins, who received severe wounds
in a vain attempt to save a B-17; Chaplain Joseph F. LaFleur, who
repeatedly ignored low-flying strafers to minister to the wounded and
dying; Pvt. Robert Andres, who on his own initiative appropriated an
abandoned truck to make seven trips with wounded men to the station
hospital; and Pfc Greeley B. Williams, who from a gunner’s post in
one of the B- I 7’s kept up a steady fire on Japanese planes until he was
killed. Medical personnel of the four emergency first-aid dressing
stations at Clark Field maintained their greatly needed services
throughout the time.50
As the enemy planes returned to their Formosan bases, it was clear
that they had won a tremendous victory. At Clark Field, high-level
bombing had destroyed hangars, shops, mess halls, barracks, and
supply buildings. The communications center had received a direct
hit which cut off the field from other points and prevented any
attempt to control pursuit operations. As a result, planes of the 17th
and 2 1st Squadrons continued their assigned patrols of the Bataan and
Manila Bay areas, unaware of the Japanese attack being carried out
no more than sixty miles away.51The B-I~’s,in spite of being incom-
pletely dispersed, suffered relatively little damage from bombs, but
2 1 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.