Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
earlier in the day: “Said planes dropped leaflets which read as follows:
Way to permanent peace causing this conflict between Japan and the
U.S. Roosevelt attempt curve our independence stop we all know
than unless the US has not oppressed Japan, this war has not been
started stop Our mission is to end this war as fast as possible and in
order to achieve this end we should cooperate with Japan fully un-
quote.” Then: “ I 3:oo Reported by G-z that Fort Stotsenburg is being
bombed”; and again-“ I 3: 00 Report received from Stotsenburg
many bombers very high bombed Clark Field at I 2: 35 P.M.”
It is not even certain that the record thus provided clears up the
much debated question of just when the Japanese attack on Clark Field
began, for there is rather specific evidence which argues for a time
some fifteen minutes earlier. No clarification, moreover, is provided
for the controversial question of why our bombers were caught,
apparently without warning, on the ground. There is reason to believe
that a warning message had reached Clark Field, but the warning
evidently was not received by bomber personnel there. In response
to a specific question from the Air Historical Office which indicated
the existence of information that a warning had been sent and ac-
knowledged by Clark Field, General Eubank under date of 5 August
1947 made the following statement:
Information of the Japanese formation which attacked Clark Field about
noon, 8 December 1941, was not received by the Bomber Command prior to
tile attack. The formation was almost directly overhead at the time the air raid
warning siren was sounded and the bombs began exploding a few seconds
thereafter. One or two false air raid warning messages had been received
earlier in the day.43
And there the question must be left. Colonel Campbell is emphatic in
his recollection that a prior warning was both sent and acknowledged;
General Eubank is equally emphatic in stating that no information
reached V Bomber Command. It is entirely possible that both officers
are correct in their recollection, but in the absence of further evidence
there would appear to be little advantage in attempts to speculate on
the probabilities of misinterpretation or other human failure that
might reconcile the two accounts.
In any case, the Japanese enjoyed the good fortune of catching the
two squadrons of B-17’s on the ground at Clark Field. This had been
the enemy’s hope when he originally scheduled an attack for the early
morning, but after a postponement of several hours, he had no reason
2 I 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.