Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
earlier in the day: “Said planes dropped leaflets which read as follows:
Way to permanent peace causing this conflict between Japan and the
U.S. Roosevelt attempt curve our independence stop we all know
than unless the US has not oppressed Japan, this war has not been
started stop Our mission is to end this war as fast as possible and in
order to achieve this end we should cooperate with Japan fully un-
quote.” Then: “ I 3:oo Reported by G-z that Fort Stotsenburg is being
bombed”; and again-“ I 3: 00 Report received from Stotsenburg
many bombers very high bombed Clark Field at I 2: 35 P.M.”
It is not even certain that the record thus provided clears up the
much debated question of just when the Japanese attack on Clark Field
began, for there is rather specific evidence which argues for a time
some fifteen minutes earlier. No clarification, moreover, is provided
for the controversial question of why our bombers were caught,
apparently without warning, on the ground. There is reason to believe
that a warning message had reached Clark Field, but the warning
evidently was not received by bomber personnel there. In response
to a specific question from the Air Historical Office which indicated
the existence of information that a warning had been sent and ac-
knowledged by Clark Field, General Eubank under date of 5 August
1947 made the following statement:
Information of the Japanese formation which attacked Clark Field about
noon, 8 December 1941, was not received by the Bomber Command prior to
tile attack. The formation was almost directly overhead at the time the air raid
warning siren was sounded and the bombs began exploding a few seconds
thereafter. One or two false air raid warning messages had been received
earlier in the day.43
And there the question must be left. Colonel Campbell is emphatic in
his recollection that a prior warning was both sent and acknowledged;
General Eubank is equally emphatic in stating that no information
reached V Bomber Command. It is entirely possible that both officers
are correct in their recollection, but in the absence of further evidence
there would appear to be little advantage in attempts to speculate on
the probabilities of misinterpretation or other human failure that
might reconcile the two accounts.
In any case, the Japanese enjoyed the good fortune of catching the
two squadrons of B-17’s on the ground at Clark Field. This had been
the enemy’s hope when he originally scheduled an attack for the early
morning, but after a postponement of several hours, he had no reason
2 I 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.