Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 173 …At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made…
  • p. 226 …Air Service Command under Col. L.S. Churchill. Because of a shortage of experienced officers, only…
  • p. 282 …President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs of staff, then meeting in Washington, had…
  • p. 287 …the arrival in Washington of Prime Minister Churchill, his chiefs of staff, and other high-ranking…
  • p. 290 …stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request, U.S. troops were to relieve…
  • p. 302 …the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime Minister and Minister of Defense…
  • p. 303 …Field Marshal Sir John Dill representing Mr. Churchill as Minister of De- fense. Sir John Dill…
  • p. 304 …of such a personal representative of Mr. Churchill might make difficult the maintenance of normal military…
  • p. 425 …O n the same day, Prime Minister Churchill informed Gen. Sir Archibald Wavell of his selection…
  • p. 628 …Western Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their military staffs in the ARCADIA…
  • p. 630 …strong support in a long cable from Churchill to Roosevelt, delivered on 5 March, in which…
  • p. 636 …first in a gen- eral meeting with Churchill, later among the airmen alone.34Arnold reviewed the…
  • p. 639 …Much had happened in the two months which had passed since Churchill had approved that plan…
  • p. 640 …Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill…
  • p. 641 …postponement was al- most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the 27th. In…
  • p. 642 …then back in Washington, that Roosevelt and Churchill “believed” that T O R C H was…
  • p. 661 …Even during the Battle of Britain, Churchill could tell the House of Commons that “there seems…
  • p. 705 …4 1 . ~ ~The following month, Prime Minister Churchill in conference with Messrs. Harry Hopkins and Averell…
  • p. 810 …2 0 August 1940, in R.S. Churchill, ed., Into Battle (London, 1941),p. 2 5…
  • p. 811 …comp., Winston Churchill’s Secret Session Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85. 161. Larner report, as…
  • p. 845 …L.S., 182 Churchill, Prime Minister Winston, 133, 1369 141, 232, 235-37, 2409 2431 252…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
earlier in the day: “Said planes dropped leaflets which read as follows:
Way to permanent peace causing this conflict between Japan and the
U.S. Roosevelt attempt curve our independence stop we all know
than unless the US has not oppressed Japan, this war has not been
started stop Our mission is to end this war as fast as possible and in
order to achieve this end we should cooperate with Japan fully un-
quote.” Then: “ I 3:oo Reported by G-z that Fort Stotsenburg is being
bombed”; and again-“ I 3: 00 Report received from Stotsenburg
many bombers very high bombed Clark Field at I 2: 35 P.M.”
It is not even certain that the record thus provided clears up the
much debated question of just when the Japanese attack on Clark Field
began, for there is rather specific evidence which argues for a time
some fifteen minutes earlier. No clarification, moreover, is provided
for the controversial question of why our bombers were caught,
apparently without warning, on the ground. There is reason to believe
that a warning message had reached Clark Field, but the warning
evidently was not received by bomber personnel there. In response
to a specific question from the Air Historical Office which indicated
the existence of information that a warning had been sent and ac-
knowledged by Clark Field, General Eubank under date of 5 August
1947 made the following statement:
Information of the Japanese formation which attacked Clark Field about
noon, 8 December 1941, was not received by the Bomber Command prior to
tile attack. The formation was almost directly overhead at the time the air raid
warning siren was sounded and the bombs began exploding a few seconds
thereafter. One or two false air raid warning messages had been received
earlier in the day.43
And there the question must be left. Colonel Campbell is emphatic in
his recollection that a prior warning was both sent and acknowledged;
General Eubank is equally emphatic in stating that no information
reached V Bomber Command. It is entirely possible that both officers
are correct in their recollection, but in the absence of further evidence
there would appear to be little advantage in attempts to speculate on
the probabilities of misinterpretation or other human failure that
might reconcile the two accounts.
In any case, the Japanese enjoyed the good fortune of catching the
two squadrons of B-17’s on the ground at Clark Field. This had been
the enemy’s hope when he originally scheduled an attack for the early
morning, but after a postponement of several hours, he had no reason
2 I 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.