Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
P E A R L H A R B O R A N D C L A R K F I E L D
Field under instruction to take no offensive action until so
T h e Summary of Activities for that date has as its first entry the fol-
lowing notation: ‘‘07: I 5 General Brereton visited No. I Victoria and
requested permission of General MacArthur to take offensive action.
H e was informed that for the time being our role was defensive, but
to stand by for orders.” And a t 0900 appears this entry: “In response
to query from General Brereton a message received from General
Sutherland advising planes not authorized to carry bombs at this time.”
T h e second of these entries is probably to be interpreted in the
context of developments occasioned by an impending enemy attack.
While air force officers awaited orders, the aircraft warning service
had reported enemy aircraft proceeding south over Lingayen Gulf
toward Manila.34All B-17’s a t Clark Field were ordered into the air
without bomb load to avoid being caught on the ground and were
instructed to patrol the waters off northern L u z o ~ . ~ ~The 20th Pursuit
Squadron, also based at Clark, was dispatched to intercept the
approaching formation, and a t Nichols Field the 17th, under command
of Lt. Boyd Wagner, received orders to cover Clark. At 0910, Col.
Harold H. George, chief of staff, V Interceptor Command, reported
to headquarters “that there are 54 airplanes in the air and 36 airplanes
in reserve and that no contact with hostile aircraft has been made.” At
092 3 , he reported “approximately 24 bi-motored enemy bombers near
Tuguegarao and I 7 near Baguio.” Simultaneously, another report
indicated that “Tarlac and Tuguegarao were being bombed.” Planes
of the 20th Pursuit had expected to make contact with the enemy
north of Manila over Rosales, but the Japanese escaped interception
by swinging east to direct their main effort against Baguio, summer
capital of the phi lip pine^.^^
Following this attack, Brereton by telephone renewed his request
for authority to take offensive action. According to the Summary of
Activities the time was 1000, and the “Chief of Staff informed General
Brereton that all aircraft would be held in reserve and that the present
attitude is strictly defensive. General Brereton stated to General
Sutherland that if Clark Field was taken out we could not operate
offensively.” T o the same entry is appended: “Bomber command
recommends bombs not be loaded at this time due to danger of exten-
sive damage by enemy air action.” At the same hour but under separate
entry appears this brief notation: “24 enemy bombers reported in
Cagayan Valley proceeding south in direction Manila.”
2 0 7

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.