Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
M. Brady, chief of staff to General Brereton, promptly took the initial
step toward mounting the operation by ordering the B-17’s at Clark
Field prepared for the mission.27Brereton himself reported at about
0500 to General MacArthur’s headquarters at Fort Santiago, where
he requested permission of Brig. Gen. Richard K. Sutherland, chief
of staff, to carry out offensive action as soon as possible after day-
light. s
That request, unhappily, has become a subject of controversy.
Conflicting statements have bee; made and the historian is left to find
his way without the aid of a complete record. Indeed, only a few
fragments of the official records of the Far East Air Force survived
the initial engagements and movements of the war, with the result
that chief reliance must be placed on the recollections of its personnel.
It would appear that the files of General Headquarters, Southwest
Pacific Area, are also i n ~ o m p l e t e . ~ ~
Since the question turns so largely on evidence drawn from the
memory that men carry of the first hectic hours of war, it seems
pertinent to observe here that there can be little doubt that to the
airmen of General MacArthur’s command the logical defensive use
of the long-range heavy bomber in the circumstances existing was to
strike at the enemy’s concentration of air and naval power on For-
mosa, and to strike before the enemy could attack.” Not only would
this have been in accord with standard AAF doctrine and with the
mission in defense of our own shores for which the B-17 originally
had been designed, but Formosa lay well within the range of the
plane, which incidentally had been built for missions extending be-
yond the distance for which fighter escort could be provided by cur-
rent models of pursuit aircraft. It is true that the number of planes
available was nowhere near that required for a decisive striking force,
but the defensive value of the B-17 lay almost entirely in its offensive
power and the alternative to its use in that manner was to save it for
possible destruction on the ground. Moreover, the mission presum-
ably would serve useful purposes of reconnaissance, and it would
have been in accordance with the recent revision of RAINBOW No.
s.* If General Brereton did not propose an early undertaking of
offensive action against the enemy on Formosa, as both officially and
publicly he has stated he did, it would be surprising indeed.
Following the publication in I 946 of The Brereton Diaries, in which
+ See above, pp. 184-85.
204

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.