Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
era1 Brereton notified officials of the Royal Australian Air Force at
Port Moresby to expect the arrival of the B-zq’s, while General Short
in Hawaii was given details of the mission by the War Department.
For a while it appeared that American forces in the Pacific would
soon have firsthand information and phorographs of Japanese naval
concentrations, but the B - q 7 S were delayed in departing from the
United States. Within a few days the War Department expressed fear
that the mission was impracticable because of the distance to be flown.
T h e mission was not canceled, however, and one of the B-24’s on 5
December reached Hawaii, where it was decided to hold it until “satis-
factorily armed.” From the first there had been difficulty in securing
and equipping the planes for the mission, and at the outbreak of hostili-
ties the second plane had not yet left the United States.Io3
In the meantime, American commanders in the Pacific had received
definite warning of an impending break in Japanese-American rela-
tions. T h e War Department on 2 7 November sent a message, regarded
as a “final alert,” l o 4to Army commanding officers in the Philippines,
Hawaii, Panama, and the Western Defense Command, which included
Alaska, warning them:
Negotiations with Japan appear to be terminated to all practical purposes
with only the barest possibilities that the Japanese government might come
back and offer to continue. Japanese future action unpredictable but hostile
action possible at any moment. If hostilities cannot, repeat cannot, be avoided
the United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act. This policy
should not, repeat not, be construed as restricting you to a course of action that
might jeopardize your defense. Prior to hostile Japanese action you are directed
to undertake such reconnaissance and other measures as you deem necessary
but these measures should be carried out so as not, repeat not, to alarm civil pop-
ulation or disclose intent. Report measures taken. Should hostilities occur you
will carry out the tasks assigned in RAINBOW 5 so far as they pertain to
Japan. Limit dissemination of this highly secret information to minimum es-
sential 0fficers.1~~
The message to General MacArthur did not include reference to
alarm of the civil population.loB
Army and Navy commanders in the Philippines immediately con-
ferred with U.S. High Commissioner Francis B. Sayre. On 28 No-
vember, General MacArthur reported that everything was being put
in readiness for a successful defense, measures having been taken,
among other things, to extend and intensify reconnaissance patrols.
Within twenty-four hours thereafter, Army forces in the Philippines
were placed upon war alert, all leaves were canceled, and two in-
‘90

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.