Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
ground forces for defense of Mindanao, but the natural advantages of
a soil that lent itself to rapid development of all-weather strips pro-
vided an argument which prevailed over the preference of general
headquarters for a more northern and presumably more secure loca-
tion. Accordingly, authority was granted to establish a temporary base
at Del Monte, where one runway suitable for heavy bombers had
existed for some months, pending a “definite location of the Bomber
Command” in the Visayan islands.99In another hurried decision the
5th Air Base Group, which had arrived in Luzon on 2 0 November,
was selected to develop the new base under the direction of Maj. Ray
T. Elsmore. Within one week, boats were procured, equipment and
supplies were loaded, and the 5oo-mile voyage from Manila was com-
pleted by the air base group. Native labor and local commercial com-
panies assisted in rushing completion of minimum facilities, but no
more than the bare minimum had been provided when the first B - 1 7 ’ ~
moved down from Clark on 5 December. Only one radio capable of
communication between Mindanao and Luzon had been set up, and
maintenance facilities were practically nonexistent.lo0
The incompleteness of these preparations at Del Monte governed
the decision on movement of the heavy bombers from Clark Field. On
4 December, General Brereton directed that immediate steps be taken
to move two squadrons with their sixteen B - I ~ ’ s ,plus a limited number
of B - 1 8 ’ ~for use as air transport, to Del Monte under a plan to have
the bombers stage through Clark Field for operations in the event of
hostilities. Though he shared the common concern over the vulner-
ability of the bombers at Clark Field, this initial movement was limited
to two squadrons because of the anticipated early arrival of the 7th
Bombardment Group ( H ) and a plan to base that entire group on
Del Monte.” Its ground echelon was already en route between Hawaii
* According to published accounts (see Frazier Hunt, MacArthur and the W a r
Against Japan [New York, 19441, pp. 30-31; Herbert Asbury and Frank Gervasi,
“MacArthur-The Story of a Great American Soldier,” Colliers, t I July 1945, and
its condensation in the Reader’s Digest for January 1946) since confirmed by General
MacArthur (see statement of 27 September 1946, N e w York Times, 2 8 September
1946), General Brereton was ordered prior to 8 December 1941 to move all B-17’s to
Del Monte. In response to a question on this point by the AAF Historical Office,
General Brereton indicated that the initiative for the transfer came from his own staff
and stated that “approval for the movement of the 16 Flying Fortresses to Del Monte
was obtained from General Sutherland only with the understanding that they would
be returned to airfields to be constructed on Cebu and Luzon as soon as the necessary
operating facilities could be prepared.” (See 1st ind., Brereton to Paul [Itr., Chief,
AAF Historical Office to CG, Third Air Force, sub.: Air Defense of the Philippine
Islands in December 1941, 3 0 Jan. 19461.) General Brereton’s recollection fits so
I 88

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.