Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E P L O Y M E N T O N T H E E V E O F H O S T I L I T I E S
battalion for transfer to the Far East Air Force; but the action came
too late to be of assistance in defense of the phi lip pine^.'^
A lack of antiaircraft artillery defenses made it appear all the more
unlikely that any hostile air attacks could be halted before military and
civil installations had been seriously damaged. Most of the three-inch
guns were clustered around Manila harbor, while a limited store of
additional three-inch and 37-mm. guns were stored in the Philippine
Ordnance Depot. Except for Clark Field, where the 200th Coast
Artillery (AA) was stationed, all airfields and other vital points were
virtually without antiaircraft protection. Early in November Maj.
Gen. J.A. Green, Chief of Coast Artillery, had suggested that part of
the harbor defense regiment be reassigned to antiaircraft defense of
airfields and other similarly critical areas, and plans for a greatly ex-
panded air force had required attention to problems of defense in the
Visayas and Mindanao. Prior to the war, however, little progress had
been made, and both General Brereton and General Green were much
concerned over the safety of grounded aircraft in the event of an early
outbreak of hostilities. Even the Manila area was inadequately pro-
tected. For three-inch shells, only low-altitude powder-train fuzes
were available, and there were few automatic weapon^.'^
In view of the relatively weak air defenses, the importance of
dispersal areas for heavy bombers became paramount. Yet the number
of fields suitable for the purpose was far below the number needed.
An airfield construction program, which included the extension and
improvement of existing fields as well as the preparation of new ones,
had been adjusted to the expanding requirements of the air force, but
it progressed much too slowly to meet with the satisfaction of air
commanders. Only Clark Field, with two large hangars, a limited dis-
persal area, blast pens, and barracks, could be considered reasonably
complete; and its vulnerability was a major cause of concern to Gen-
eral Brereton and his staff. In mid-November attempts were made by
air force officials to acquire construction equipment for building
dispersal pens at Clark, but the efforts came to naught.”
Of chief significance in the development of a building program was
the decision to establish a heavy bomber base on Mindanao, southern-
most of the large islands in the Philippines. This decision was in
accordance with recommendations made by General Brereton’s staff
during his absence in mid-November on a trip to Australia. Objections
were raised because the war plan for the Philippines did not provide
‘87

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.