Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E P L O Y M E N T O N T H E E V E O F H O S T I L I T I E S
tion of associated forces in the Far East had been supplanted by
provisions for mutual co-operation.”
With modification of the basic war plan pointing up the importance
of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash-
ington undertook to accelerate the dispatch of heavy bombers to the
Philippines. By the second week in November it was planned to send
“all modernized” B-I 7’s from the United States to the Far East; within
a few days the plan was broadened to include all B-24’s as well. Fulfil-
ment of the project would have left only seventeen B-17’s within the
Zone of the Interior: five B - I ~ E ’ swhich were being used for test
flights, one B - I ~ Cwhich was in a repair depot, and eleven B - I ~ A ’ s
and B’s which were obsolete. So serious was the situation in the Far
East that even the twelve B-17’s of the Hawaiian Air Force were
under consideration for transfer to the Philippines. T h e priority which
the Far East Air Force now occupied not only disrupted the training
activities of the Hawaiian Air Force, but it also relegated the air de-
fense needs of Hawaii to a secondary place. By z z November, AAF
officials warned that all available heavy bombers and pursuit planes
destined for the Philippines should be en route not later than 6 De-
cember. This hope was not fulfilled, but it reflected a growing fear
that the planned reinforcements would not reach the Philippines in
time to insure the defense of the islands. T h e program of reinforce-
ment had been based on an assumption that hostilities could be post-
poned until a t least March or April 1942. Japanese movements in the
Pacific now seemed to presage a much earlier outbreak of hostilities, as
also did the strained diploniatic relations between the United States
and Japan.92
T h e Far East Air Force had begun to take precautionary measures
early in General Brereton ordered all post, group, and
squadron commanders to be prepared for any emergency. Each head-
quarters was to operate a message center continuously and was to
designate an “alert officer” in addition to the officer of the day. Base
commanders were ordered to keep sufficient personnel available to
perform guard duties and any other tasks required in an emergency.
Special instructions to tactical units emphasized the need for opera-
tional readiness: not only were aircraft to be dispersed so as to mini-
mize the effects of an aerial attack, but crews for all aircraft in
commission were to be placed on “two-hour readiness” call day and
night. T h e 19th Bombardment Group was ordered to have one squad-
‘85

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.