Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
nese aggression in Asia. AAF Headquarters felt that a striking force of
heavy bombers would be a necessary part of any attempt to guarantee
the security of the Philippines, and there was a feeling among War
Department officials that the presence of such a force would act “as
a threat to keep Japan in line.” Consequently, and as a part of the
over-all plan for maintaining a strategic defensive in the Pacific, the
AAF now allocated to the Far East four heavy bombardment groups,
to consist of 2 7 2 aircraft with 68 in reserve, and an additional two
pursuit groupd\of 130 planes.80
Although the supply of aircraft in the United States did not permit
immediate implementation of these plans, the necessary authority was
received early in August when the Secretary of War approved a pro-
gram for sending modern planes to the Philippines as soon as they be-
came available. Arrangements were made for fifty P-qoE’s to be sent
directly from the factories and for twenty-eight P - ~ o B s ,taken from
operating units, to be shipped to the Philippines in September. Pro-
curement of heavy bombers was more difficult, for in the summer of
1941 not a single group in the AAF was completely equipped with
such planes. The 19th Bombardment Group, which had ferried the
first B-17’s to Hawaii in May, was selected for permanent transfer to
the Philippines, and the group was given priority in the assignment of
B-17’s. So urgent was the need for heavy bombers in the Far East,
however, that the AAF did not wait for the 19th Group to pioneer
an air route to the Philippines. By the end of July it had been decided
that a provisional squadron from the Hawaiian Air Force would make
the first flight of land-based bombers across the Pacific.
Preparations for the flight were made with utmost secrecy. Since
information was lacking on airfields in Australian territory, two Army
officers were flown by Navy plane from Honolulu in order to survey
facilities at Rabaul in New Britain, a t Port Moresby in New Guinea,
and a t Darwin in Australia. Runway construction on Midway and
Wake islands was pushed by naval authorities, while picked crews
from the Hawaiian Air Force underwent intensive training for the
unprecedented flight. On the morning of 5 September the 14th Bom-
bardment Squadron ( H ) , consisting of nine B- I 7D’s and seventy-five
crew members under the command of Maj. Emmett O’Donnell, Jr.,
took off from Hickam Field and headed for the first stop a t Midway,
I, I 3 2 nautical miles distant. T h e first leg of the flight was completed
after seven hours and ten minutes. The crews refueled and serviced
178

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.