Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
lery to the Hawaiian Department." The aircraft strength at the
beginning of 1941consisted of I I 7 planes, all of them obsolescent or
antiquated." In mid-February, thirty-one P-36's, with pilots and crew
chiefs, were placed aboard the carrier Enterprise at San Diego, Cali-
fornia, and sent to the Hawaiian Islands. Modern pursuit planes were
made available within the next two months, and by mid-April a total
of fifty-five p-40'~had been transferred via carrier from the West
Coast to Oahu, where they were flown off the deck to Army air-
fields.6*
A decision to allocate B-17's to the Hawaiian Air Force provoked
a considerably greater amount of discussion and entailed far more
intricate planning than did the transfer of the P-40's. Heavy bombers
could reach their destination only by flying, and no mass flight of
heavy bombers had ever been made over the 2,400-mile stretch be-
tween the West Coast and Hawaii. In official quarters there was at
first some hesitation to undertake such an operation for fear of public
reaction in the event of failure." The need for an air striking force
in Hawaii, however, seemed to justify the risks involved, and early
in April the Fourth Air Force began to make preparations for ferry-
ing twenty-one B-17'~to the Hawaiian Islands. The 19th Bombard-
ment Group, under the command of Lt. Col. Eugene L. Eubank,
was selected to fly the planes, and service tests were conducted on
the aircraft before they were certified for the operation. Weather
data and navigational problems were studied, while arrangements
were made for assistance by the Navy Department, Pan American
Airways, and commercial radio stations in San Francisco and Hono-
lulu. The Navy stationed four guard vessels at 500-mile intervals
along the path of the flight, and all naval vessels in the vicinity were
asked to transmit weather information. The Navy also assisted in
establishing communication facilities to insure the proper ground-air
liaison in San Francisco and Honolulu; commercial airline officials in
the same locations agreed to transmit weather forecasts and map sig-
nals; and commercial radio stations in the two cities arranged to pro-
vide homing signals by broadcasting continuously during the flight.
As a result of thorough preparations, the flight was accomplished
without undue incident. O n 1 3 May twenty-one B - I ~ D ' stook off
from Hamilton Field, California, and on the next morning, after an
average elapsed time of thirteen hours and ten minutes, the planes
landed a t Hickam Field within five minutes of the estimated time of
1 7 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.