Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
resulting loss of life and equipment might be prohibitive. The heads
of the Alaska and Western Defense Commands therefore maintained
that the air defense of Alaska must be made by planes permanently
stationed in the territory and by crewmen trained in the area.49
Headquarters of the AAF appreciated the urgency of the situation
in Alaska, and remedial action was promised as soon as the necessary
aircraft should become a~ailable.~’Early in November the Chief of
the AAF directed that plans be made to send a complete bombard-
ment group to Alaska, and studies were also undertaken to determine
the requirements for accommodating a pursuit group in the same
area.51These moves had not advanced beyond the planning stage by
7 December 1941, and the aircraft strength in Alaska still consisted
of twelve B - I ~ A ’ sand twenty P-36’s. The 28th Composite Group,
though undermanned and poorly equipped, had been trained in
Alaskan flying, and every pilot had made several landings at each air-
field then ready to receive p l a n e ~ . ~ ~Numerous flights had been made
for the purpose of aerial photography and mapping, and coastal
patrols were being run from Seward to Point Combat
crews were ready for transition to more up-to-date planes, but the
relatively low priority held by Alaska among the overseas garrisons
precluded the assignment of any modern planes to the North Pacific
area.54The air force of the Alaska Defense Command was, in fact,
the only overseas air force which did not possess a single up-to-date
plane prior to the outbreak of hostilities. The necessity for Alaskan
air defense was by this time clearly recognized, and decisions required
to implement that defense had been rendered,
Hawaii
Air defenses in the Territory of Hawaii were the result of more
than twenty years’ development, and their status by 7 December
1941 was relatively imposing. A total of 754 officers and 6,706 enlisted
men made up the personnel complement of the Hawaiian Air Force,
which was concentrated on the island of Oahu. The force, com-
manded by Maj. Gen. Frederick L. Martin, was organized tactically
into the 18th Bombardment Wing, with headquarters at Hickam
Field, and the 14th Pursuit Wing, with headquarters a t Wheeler
Field. Units of the bombardment wing included the 5th and I Ith
Bombardment Groups ( H ) , the 58th Bombardment Squadron (L) ,
and the 86th Observation The latter unit was stationed
I 7 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.