Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
D E P L O Y M E N T O N T H E E V E O F H O S T I L I T I E S
coast line, prevented uninterrupted work. Every advantage had been
taken of the summer months, and by the fall of 1941 Elmendorf,
Ladd, Kodiak, Yakutat, and Nome fields were capable of supporting
tactical operations by a t least one squadron each, while more than a
dozen additional fields of various sizes were nearing completion. A
detailed plan had been drawn up for aircraft warning installations,
including radar detector stations and filter centers. The plan was
approved on 3 December, but almost no equipment was available for
use.47Army airways communications personnel, who had arrived in
the spring of 1941, were operating at four stations, despite difficulties
imposed by peculiar radio atmospherics and the lack of adequate
power."
No additional air units were sent to Alaska prior to the opening
of hostilities, and the inability of the single composite group to carry
out assigned functions of Army aviation was a chief cause of concern
to commanding officers. In Alaska, as a t other overseas bases which
were within reach of reinforcement by air from the United States,
the AAF adhered to the policy that the aviation complement of Army
garrisons should be held to the minimum required to meet initially
such emergencies as might arise. The policy was based upon the gen-
erally sound principle of concentration of force within the United
States under plans to utilize the special mobility of the air weapon in
case of attack upon any of our outposts. But the heads of both the
Alaska and the Western Defense Commands, along with Lt. Col.
Everett S. Davis, commanding officer of the air force, joined in urg-
ing that additional air units be sent to Alaska for permanent station.
It was pointed out that an attack or threat of attack on Alaska could
be met only by aircraft present a t the time the threat occurred, and
in the fall of 1941 such a threat was regarded as a possibility. O n
islands off Alaska Peninsula and along the north and west coasts of
Alaska, numerous sites existed which might be used for hostile land-
ings. With only a small amount of work, enemy forces might prepare
sheltered bays and landing strips for use as temporary naval and air
bases and it would be difficult for defenders to dislodge them. Com-
manders responsible for Alaskan defense felt that in an emergency
air reinforcements from the United States, in all probability, would
not arrive in time. Granted that reinforcements could reach Alaska
in time, pilots and crewmen trained only in the United States would
be unfamiliar with the Alaskan terrain and flying conditions, and the
'69

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.