Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 47 …s Independent Force, the whole of the French Air Division (strategic reserve), and Italian and Portuguese…
  • p. 113 …Japanese Air Power The Japanese air forces, divided into separate army and navy air arms, had…
  • p. 119 …naval air service, and a colonial air force.” For their air doctrines, the Italians depended almost…
  • p. 120 …In its first “combat” test during the thirties the Italian Air Force faced no real opposition…
  • p. 121 …The hope was not fulfilled, for numerous weaknesses in the Italian Air Force rapidly came to…
  • p. 122 …The fundamental weakness of the Italian Air Force was not in its theory of air power…
  • p. 197 …naval forces, and within prescribed boundaries to destroy any German and Italian naval, air, and ground…
  • p. 386 …More threatening were Rommel’s forces in North Africa, for the very existence of the air…
  • p. 554 …Chennault, who since 1937 had been serving as special adviser to the Chinese Air Force. Known…
  • p. 705 …Brett, Chief of the Air Corps, to England for study of the problem. Specifically, he was…
  • p. 752 …USSBS, Japanese Air Power. 9. Notes on the Italian Air Force, in special file of Brig…
  • p. 805 …History, First Air Force. 44. History, Caribbean Air Force, 8 May 1941-6 Mar. 1942, p…
  • p. 851 …E S Italian Air Force: 82-85; development, Italian East Africa, 84 Italy, Air Ministry, 82…
  • p. 857 …See Italian Air Force. Reinforcements. See theaters. Renault works, 593 Replacement Control Depot, ~ z t h…
D E P L O Y M E N T O N T H E E V E O F H O S T I L I T I E S
coast line, prevented uninterrupted work. Every advantage had been
taken of the summer months, and by the fall of 1941 Elmendorf,
Ladd, Kodiak, Yakutat, and Nome fields were capable of supporting
tactical operations by a t least one squadron each, while more than a
dozen additional fields of various sizes were nearing completion. A
detailed plan had been drawn up for aircraft warning installations,
including radar detector stations and filter centers. The plan was
approved on 3 December, but almost no equipment was available for
use.47Army airways communications personnel, who had arrived in
the spring of 1941, were operating at four stations, despite difficulties
imposed by peculiar radio atmospherics and the lack of adequate
power."
No additional air units were sent to Alaska prior to the opening
of hostilities, and the inability of the single composite group to carry
out assigned functions of Army aviation was a chief cause of concern
to commanding officers. In Alaska, as a t other overseas bases which
were within reach of reinforcement by air from the United States,
the AAF adhered to the policy that the aviation complement of Army
garrisons should be held to the minimum required to meet initially
such emergencies as might arise. The policy was based upon the gen-
erally sound principle of concentration of force within the United
States under plans to utilize the special mobility of the air weapon in
case of attack upon any of our outposts. But the heads of both the
Alaska and the Western Defense Commands, along with Lt. Col.
Everett S. Davis, commanding officer of the air force, joined in urg-
ing that additional air units be sent to Alaska for permanent station.
It was pointed out that an attack or threat of attack on Alaska could
be met only by aircraft present a t the time the threat occurred, and
in the fall of 1941 such a threat was regarded as a possibility. O n
islands off Alaska Peninsula and along the north and west coasts of
Alaska, numerous sites existed which might be used for hostile land-
ings. With only a small amount of work, enemy forces might prepare
sheltered bays and landing strips for use as temporary naval and air
bases and it would be difficult for defenders to dislodge them. Com-
manders responsible for Alaskan defense felt that in an emergency
air reinforcements from the United States, in all probability, would
not arrive in time. Granted that reinforcements could reach Alaska
in time, pilots and crewmen trained only in the United States would
be unfamiliar with the Alaskan terrain and flying conditions, and the
'69

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.