Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 28 …PARNAMIRIMFIELD,NATAL,BRAZIL,JUNE1942 . . . BLUIE WEST I , JUNE 1942 . . . . . . . . . . REYKJAVIKAIRFIELD,ICELAND,APRILI 942 . . . . . . THENIGHTSHIFT,PATTERSONFIELD,ICELAND…
  • p. 157 …Brazil offered a likely avenue of approach. Natal, a focal point for established trans-Atlantic air…
  • p. 371 …Pivoting at Natal, it had to traverse an additional 6,000 miles in order to reach…
  • p. 375 …Panair do Brasil, a Pan American subsidiary, had undertaken at Belem and Natal the development with…
  • p. 376 …From Belem, the ten transports proceeded to Natal and thence across the Atlantic to Bathurst. All…
  • p. 378 …Miami-San Juan (Puerto Rico) -Port of Spain (Trinidad) - Belem-Natal-Fisherman’s Lake (Liberia) -Lagos…
  • p. 384 ATKINSON FIELD, BRITISH GUIANA, JUNE 1942 PARNAMIRIM FIELD, NATAL, BRAZIL, JUNE 1942
  • p. 385 …The two bases a t Belem and Natal, built with airport development program funds by the…
  • p. 386 …The most feasible route was determined to be from Natal to Ascension Island to Pointe Noire…
  • p. 388 …Tampa-Trinidad- Belem-Natal-Accra-Khartoum-Cairo-Habbaniya-Karachi.At Karachi the LB-3o’s under…
  • p. 413 …In order to avoid piling up a heavy backlog of cargo and passengers at Natal, it…
  • p. 414 …L D W A R I 1 Natal toward the end of June, at which time…
  • p. 854 …78 Narsarssuak, 157, 343, 641 Nassau, 355 Natal, 120, 319, 321-22, 324, 3 2 ~ 3…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
Command, provided for a group of advanced bases, a series of inter-
mediate airfields, a chain of fields between Anchorage and the United
States, and an extensive aircraft warning system. The first item pro-
voked the greatest amount of discussion among the services respon-
sible for protection of Alaska. The older theory of Alaskan defense
had been centered around the Seward-Anchorage areas, supplemented
by joint Army and Navy defense of naval installations at Kodiak
Island; and control of the North Pacific was naturally regarded as a
task of the Navy, operating from bases at Kodiak and Dutch Harbor.
The latter base, on Unalaska Island in the Aleutians, constituted the
westernmost installation in the area. Protection of Dutch Harbor was
a function of Army air units, and since that protection could not be
furnished without air bases in the vicinity, the Alaska Defense Com-
mand proposed to construct: a field on Umnak Island, sixty-five miles
west of Dutch Harbor. Naval authorities viewed the proposal as
undesirable, for Umnak had no adequate harbor development and
construction of the base would put an increased strain on sea com-
munications a t a time when shipping was at a premium."
There was, however, a cogent reason for development of an airfield
on Umnak, beyond considerations of immediate protection of Dutch
Harbor. Such a base would increase the striking range of Army
bombers, enabling them to command a radius 400 miles greater than
would be possible from such a point as Chignik, on the Alaska Penin-
sula. It was important that any hostile force be intercepted before it
could launch an attack, and it was likewise important that enemy
forces be prevented from establishing bases in the outer Aleutians.
For both contingencies, the existence of an airfield and a long-range
striking force in the Aleutians seemed to be necessary. The Aleutian
Islands comprised steppingstones which could lead in two directions,
and their offensive possibilities for American forces would be nqllified
by a lack of airfields, At the insistence of the Navy Department the
Umnak proposal was referred to the Joint Board of the Army and
Navy, and approval was given on 26 November 1 9 4 1 . ~ ~
The remainder of the air defense program met with little opposi-
tion. Airfield construction was proceeding under the direction of
Army engineers and the Civil Aeronautics Administration, although
in the colder areas of Alaska the work was impeded by arctic condi-
tions. Heavy rainfall, particularly along the southern and western
* See maps, pp. 305, 463.
I 68

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.